4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

which one is better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2005, 02:24 PM
  #1  
stangman2354
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
stangman2354's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 838
Default which one is better?

I'm looking at deals for a plenum tb combo they have bbk, c&l, and accufab. The bbk and c&l are 300 and the accufab is 400 but they are both polished. Which is the better brand? And this would be my first thing to put on my car performance wise on my 99 GT should i get it? I know you guys would say to get 4 10's and that kind of stuff first but this is the first time i seen the prices this low for the plenum and tb and ill just get the other stuff after it. And is the c&l a good intake? or should i just go with k&n? Help would be greatly appreciated. thanks
stangman2354 is offline  
Old 12-04-2005, 02:29 PM
  #2  
code3GT
Mustang Nazi
 
code3GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texas, baby
Posts: 13,444
Default RE: which one is better?

I ran a C&L plenum with BBK 75mm TB.
code3GT is offline  
Old 12-04-2005, 04:50 PM
  #3  
Bad04OrngGT
2nd Gear Member
 
Bad04OrngGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 217
Default RE: which one is better?

i also ran the c&l with the 75mm t/b and i seen decent gains with that and intake
Bad04OrngGT is offline  




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38 PM.