nanaki

this is also an older one, i don't know what models they have or had out. my friend had it in his stealth for awhile and gave it to me after he sold it. said he ran a 14.5(give or take a tenth. can't remember exact number) at the track when he used it and his actual time was a low 13 somewhere.

1BAD3V

Well I know the new ones are supposed to be to 1/1000 of a second accurate. Supposedly they test with g-tech now when they test cars for 1/4, 0-60 and stuff like that. Just what I heard.

72MachOne99GT

our mods were VERY VERY similar

but use this as a means to judge yourself man

1999GT 5sp
o/r H, Borla Catback, 4.10's NO TIRES
14.545@99.37 w/ 2.226 60'

1999GT 5sp
o/r H, Borla Catback, 4.10's, MT ET Street Radials
14.086@99.07 w/ 2.050 60'

if you were really spinning as bad as you were, but were slamming the gears hard, which i DIDNT do very well at all, youre probably capable of trapping in the 101 range at best but probably with a **** poor time of 14.5's

BadBob99GTConv

the g-tech I borrowed said i ran 14.1, then I went to the track ad ran mid 13's., [&:]

Cumstang02

You can look at those numbers and tell they're not accurate. Even you said that you had bald tires, spun pretty badly and don't have many mods.

757GT

Those G-techs are not accurate. My buddy has a g-tech pro and on my old GT it said I ran 14.0@108. I actually ran 13.86@101.

lexy

I think you'd do 13.9 on the quater mile track with all that stuff, well maybe a little lower. 4.10 gears are great for that purpose. I ran my stock Vert at 14.2, so those time do sound decent

Cumstang02

Those times sound about right.

IROLLSALEEN

hahahahahahahahahahahahah go to the track and get your heart broke.

Cumstang02

Do i have to race in my stang?