this is also an older one, i don't know what models they have or had out. my friend had it in his stealth for awhile and gave it to me after he sold it. said he ran a 14.5(give or take a tenth. can't remember exact number) at the track when he used it and his actual time was a low 13 somewhere.

 

Well I know the new ones are supposed to be to 1/1000 of a second accurate. Supposedly they test with g-tech now when they test cars for 1/4, 0-60 and stuff like that. Just what I heard.

 

our mods were VERY VERY similar

but use this as a means to judge yourself man

1999GT 5sp
o/r H, Borla Catback, 4.10's NO TIRES
14.545@99.37 w/ 2.226 60'

1999GT 5sp
o/r H, Borla Catback, 4.10's, MT ET Street Radials
14.086@99.07 w/ 2.050 60'

if you were really spinning as bad as you were, but were slamming the gears hard, which i DIDNT do very well at all, youre probably capable of trapping in the 101 range at best but probably with a **** poor time of 14.5's

 

the g-tech I borrowed said i ran 14.1, then I went to the track ad ran mid 13's., [&:]

 

You can look at those numbers and tell they're not accurate. Even you said that you had bald tires, spun pretty badly and don't have many mods.

 

Those G-techs are not accurate. My buddy has a g-tech pro and on my old GT it said I ran 14.0@108. I actually ran 13.86@101.

 

I think you'd do 13.9 on the quater mile track with all that stuff, well maybe a little lower. 4.10 gears are great for that purpose. I ran my stock Vert at 14.2, so those time do sound decent

 

Those times sound about right.

 

hahahahahahahahahahahahah go to the track and get your heart broke.

 

Do i have to race in my stang?