4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

96 GT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2010, 05:48 PM
  #1  
FOURSIXALLDAY
Thread Starter
 
FOURSIXALLDAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: washington
Posts: 38
Default 96 GT

WILL PUTTING 2000 P71 CROWN VIC HEADS ON MY 96 GT INCREASE PERFORMANCE?
FOURSIXALLDAY is offline  
Old 11-11-2010, 05:52 PM
  #2  
PurpleIcedGT
6th Gear Member
 
PurpleIcedGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,028
Default

Holy Mother of God.
PurpleIcedGT is offline  
Old 11-11-2010, 05:56 PM
  #3  
uberstang1
Chupacabra
 
uberstang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: wilkes-barre PA
Posts: 9,621
Default

PROBABLY NOT WORTH THE TIME AND EFFORT UNLESS THEY MATCH THE SPEC OF PI HEADS OF THE 99-04 GT.
uberstang1 is offline  
Old 11-11-2010, 06:06 PM
  #4  
FOURSIXALLDAY
Thread Starter
 
FOURSIXALLDAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: washington
Posts: 38
Default

the guy i bought the car from put those heads on it and i wasnt sure if it would increase performance because i dont know how it performed in the first place. but it runs great, so im guessing it helped?
FOURSIXALLDAY is offline  
Old 11-11-2010, 06:09 PM
  #5  
FOURSIXALLDAY
Thread Starter
 
FOURSIXALLDAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: washington
Posts: 38
Default

anyone else got some input i would like to hear about it. thanks.
FOURSIXALLDAY is offline  
Old 11-11-2010, 06:13 PM
  #6  
MU71L4710N
5th Gear Member
 
MU71L4710N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 3,189
Default

wow........ okay

so your car runs good now....so that means that all 96gt's that don't get a head swap run bad?

and no, 2000 cv heads were not PI. they were NPI until 2001. which means you got no "performance increase".

your previous owner was either dumb and did a lot of work for nothing, or cracked his heads and needed replacements.

and you dont need to make posts every 3 minutes.
MU71L4710N is offline  
Old 11-11-2010, 06:17 PM
  #7  
FOURSIXALLDAY
Thread Starter
 
FOURSIXALLDAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: washington
Posts: 38
Default

yes i do
FOURSIXALLDAY is offline  
Old 11-12-2010, 05:31 AM
  #8  
uberstang1
Chupacabra
 
uberstang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: wilkes-barre PA
Posts: 9,621
Default

2000 cv heads were not PI. they were NPI until 2001. which means you got no "performance increase".
That confirms that, if they were put on because the car had a busted hear or something thats one thing, but if they were put on with the intentions of a "performance upgrade" someone totally wasted alot of time, money, and effort and still ended up with 190 rear wheel horsepower.
uberstang1 is offline  
Old 11-12-2010, 05:51 AM
  #9  
FOURSIXALLDAY
Thread Starter
 
FOURSIXALLDAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: washington
Posts: 38
Default

ya, i would of never done that because i didnt think it had any effect on performance, but im pretty sure its pushin more than 190 to the wheels, the car only has 90k and performance mods include,long tube headers, jegs xpipe, k&n cold air intake, performance hand held tuner, 3.73 gears, steeda underdrive pullys, and the timing is advanced. so im guessing 280 to the wheels, something around that. what u guys think?
FOURSIXALLDAY is offline  
Old 11-12-2010, 06:49 AM
  #10  
uberstang1
Chupacabra
 
uberstang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: wilkes-barre PA
Posts: 9,621
Default

LOL I don't mean to laugh but you are no where even remotley close to 280 rwhp. 190-210 TOPS. Its a sad fact that the 96-98 2v motor just isnt gonna make power like that with bolt ons. 280rwhp would be those mods on a cobra with a tune of that same year.

Last edited by uberstang1; 11-12-2010 at 06:52 AM.
uberstang1 is offline  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 AM.