Dumped the BBK headers...
So I cancelled my BBK LT headers for some MAC LT headers and my mid pipe is a pro chamber. What do you think of MAC headers and pro chamber??? Does anyone have this setup? How do you like it???
i have it.. sounded good with flowmaster 40 series..
http://youtube.com/watch?v=3MhLChRQW08
not so good with borla pro xs..
hopefully good with magnapacks!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=3MhLChRQW08
not so good with borla pro xs..
hopefully good with magnapacks!
ORIGINAL: AZsFinest
so can anyone explain a lil more on why a prochamber might be better thanan x pipe?
so can anyone explain a lil more on why a prochamber might be better thanan x pipe?
but the power diff. is no where near n e thing you could feel or notice.(maybe 2-3) its all about sound
no you wont need a tuner, unless you get an off-road midpipe without mill eliminators. then you would use the tuner to tun off the CEL or check engine light.
ORIGINAL: H0SS302
a prochamber is no better than an h or x. i wanna say the x pipe ALWAYS yields the most power out of all the midpipes(but i could be wrong lol)
but the power diff. is no where near n e thing you could feel or notice.(maybe 2-3) its all about sound
no you wont need a tuner, unless you get an off-road midpipe without mill eliminators. then you would use the tuner to tun off the CEL or check engine light.
ORIGINAL: AZsFinest
so can anyone explain a lil more on why a prochamber might be better thanan x pipe?
so can anyone explain a lil more on why a prochamber might be better thanan x pipe?
but the power diff. is no where near n e thing you could feel or notice.(maybe 2-3) its all about sound
no you wont need a tuner, unless you get an off-road midpipe without mill eliminators. then you would use the tuner to tun off the CEL or check engine light.
but your right the performance difference between h, x, and prochamber is nearly nothing. the only reason to buy midpipes is for sound.


