5.3L 2v stoker instead..
ORIGINAL: I G Joe
can you not port the heads for bigger valves? there are instances where 1 valve is actually better than 2 but maybe these 4.6's dont roll that way?
just wondering if you can put bigger valves in these engines and if it will make that much of a difference for N/A purposes, i understand our 281's are lacking the cubes to really push a lot of HP N/A for cheap money.
can you not port the heads for bigger valves? there are instances where 1 valve is actually better than 2 but maybe these 4.6's dont roll that way?
just wondering if you can put bigger valves in these engines and if it will make that much of a difference for N/A purposes, i understand our 281's are lacking the cubes to really push a lot of HP N/A for cheap money.
ORIGINAL: livefast1
and in no case is overboring to gain clearance for bigger valves a good stand point for performance because that just goes to show how shrouded the valves are.
and in no case is overboring to gain clearance for bigger valves a good stand point for performance because that just goes to show how shrouded the valves are.
No matter how big you go on the valves, its just not a well designed head from CFM point of view.
I swear, WHERE are the companys for our 4.6 2v??? I simply do not understand how there is not an aftermarket head for the 2v yet, consdiering the sheer volume of 4.6L 2v out there (think of it... 96-04 mustang GT, early Tbird 4.6, truck 4.6).
The first person that comes up with a 275+ CFM aftermarket head that can be CNC for more will be a multi millionare... and have at least some of my money too.
ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6
Thats exactly what I was thinking.
No matter how big you go on the valves, its just not a well designed head from CFM point of view.
I swear, WHERE are the companys for our 4.6 2v??? I simply do not understand how there is not an aftermarket head for the 2v yet, consdiering the sheer volume of 4.6L 2v out there (think of it... 96-04 mustang GT, early Tbird 4.6, truck 4.6).
The first person that comes up with a 275+ CFM aftermarket head that can be CNC for more will be a multi millionare... and have at least some of my money too.
ORIGINAL: livefast1
and in no case is overboring to gain clearance for bigger valves a good stand point for performance because that just goes to show how shrouded the valves are.
and in no case is overboring to gain clearance for bigger valves a good stand point for performance because that just goes to show how shrouded the valves are.
No matter how big you go on the valves, its just not a well designed head from CFM point of view.
I swear, WHERE are the companys for our 4.6 2v??? I simply do not understand how there is not an aftermarket head for the 2v yet, consdiering the sheer volume of 4.6L 2v out there (think of it... 96-04 mustang GT, early Tbird 4.6, truck 4.6).
The first person that comes up with a 275+ CFM aftermarket head that can be CNC for more will be a multi millionare... and have at least some of my money too.
Hey guys. Im new to this forum and wanted you guys take on what motor i should use. I have a 2001 mustang gt stock as a rock. I have decided to go with either turbos or a procharger. I have heard a lot about swapping in a 5.4 2v and was wondering what you guys think. All im looking for is 600 rwhp on pump gas. I will also have a set of fox lake stage 3 2v heads and the cams have yet to be determined because i havnt made up my mind to go blower or turbo. Any help would be great.
i dont know if i was bull****ed but some guy around town is saying his mustang has a big bore kit and like a lot of money into the motor so hes pushing 600+ rwhp all motor. i didnt believe him but i gave him the benefit of the doubt



