4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Dyno time.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 16, 2008 | 10:43 PM
  #11  
SINISTER's Avatar
SINISTER
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,284
From: Miami, FL
Cool Results

Results are in. Got it done today. RWHP was a bit higher than I expected, but RWTQ was lower than I expected. Scanned the sheet, here it is:


Videos are uploading now. Will update post when they are done.

Comments and questions welcomed.
Old Aug 16, 2008 | 10:46 PM
  #12  
steve0914's Avatar
steve0914
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,286
From: Georgia
Default

nice numbers man i need to get into the dyno
Old Aug 16, 2008 | 11:47 PM
  #13  
mutabi's Avatar
mutabi
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 8
Default

Very nice numbers!

Looking at your AF ratio I dont think I could draw a straighter line lol. WHat was the actual number on it do you know? Looks like its in the 13's somewhere. How did they sample the AF?
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 12:08 AM
  #14  
SINISTER's Avatar
SINISTER
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,284
From: Miami, FL
Default

They sampled the A/F mixture with the sniffer in the tailpipe. Don't know if they did anything else, but I'm sure I could find out. As for the tune on it, it's the Diablo canned tune with the timing advanced all the way, and I messed with the WOT fuel tables a bit as well, but very minimally.
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 05:04 AM
  #15  
contentsunderpressur's Avatar
contentsunderpressur
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,080
From: Bay Minette Alabama
Default

What did it make? This computer won't let me see any pics or vids.
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 05:55 AM
  #16  
ateupsoldier's Avatar
ateupsoldier
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 56
From: california
Default not bad

very nice numbers, i was hoping 260 for ya, did you tune 93 octane?
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 11:40 AM
  #17  
SINISTER's Avatar
SINISTER
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,284
From: Miami, FL
Default

Run 1 was 251.61 rwhp and 268.61 rwtq. Run 2 was 252.17 rwhp and 268.74 rwtq.

Here are the videos from the runs:
First pull: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-cVT2M6NKA

Second pull: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgoRmpj_gtU
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 06:37 PM
  #18  
GhostRider02GT's Avatar
GhostRider02GT
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,456
From: the flatlands
Default

wow the torque is low, whats up with that? nice hp numbers though
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 06:45 PM
  #19  
teej281's Avatar
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,286
From: South Central PA
Default

torque numbers are low because of having such low gears. the lower the gears, the more torque lost. my friend has 4.10s and he put down 278rwtq and i have stock gears with a lot less mods and put down 281rwtq. also ive heard of a new GTO dropping 40rwtq from adding 4.10's. so thats why.
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 10:38 PM
  #20  
02oxfordwhiteGT's Avatar
02oxfordwhiteGT
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19
Default

i could be wrong but his year stang comes stock with 3.27? so 4.10s would be a higher gear no? wouldnt it be more tq cause it gives you the seat of the pants feel. not calling you out just wondering as 4.10s are my next mod. thanks



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 PM.