4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

dyno numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-2009, 08:12 PM
  #21  
1999 GT
3rd Gear Member
 
1999 GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 897
Default

Originally Posted by Mustang3GT07
I bet them are not SAE numbers either!
yes...but superflow dyno so...lol just sayin
1999 GT is offline  
Old 09-10-2009, 09:38 PM
  #22  
steve0914
5th Gear Member
 
steve0914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 4,286
Default

not enough
steve0914 is offline  
Old 09-10-2009, 10:10 PM
  #23  
justinschmidt1
4th Gear Member
 
justinschmidt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Delawere
Posts: 1,334
Default

Originally Posted by 1999 GT
i beg to differ....my car made 241rwhp/280rwtq with just a 75mm plenum and exhaust...with no tune, tb, or filter

but every car is different i guess
I bet theres more differance in the actual dyno than the variability in the car.
justinschmidt1 is offline  
Old 09-11-2009, 06:44 AM
  #24  
devongarver
5th Gear Member
 
devongarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,994
Default

Dynojets and mustang dynos are two different beasts. One benefit of a mustang dyno is that it has an "adjustable" drum weight. The weight doesn't actually change, the resistance does, so that it can match the weight of the car. This ensures proper tuning.

Atleast, this is what my last tuner told me. He had a mustang dyno, all my other tunes were on regular dynojets. (this was with my ranger not my mustang)
devongarver is offline  
Old 09-11-2009, 08:16 AM
  #25  
Roush2002
3rd Gear Member
 
Roush2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 615
Default

i was told the numbers on a mustang dyno are a bit lower but are more accurate.
Roush2002 is offline  
Old 09-11-2009, 08:56 AM
  #26  
devongarver
5th Gear Member
 
devongarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,994
Default

Originally Posted by Roush2002
i was told the numbers on a mustang dyno are a bit lower but are more accurate.
Exactly, because the average dynojet uses a 2500lb roller, whereas a mustang dyno is the same as the car it's tuning. So, a dynojet tunes for a "2500lb" car, while a mustangdyno tunes to "real life".
devongarver is offline  
Old 09-11-2009, 09:51 AM
  #27  
Roush2002
3rd Gear Member
 
Roush2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 615
Default

Originally Posted by devongarver
Exactly, because the average dynojet uses a 2500lb roller, whereas a mustang dyno is the same as the car it's tuning. So, a dynojet tunes for a "2500lb" car, while a mustangdyno tunes to "real life".
^^^yes thats the way it was explained to me.
Roush2002 is offline  
Old 09-11-2009, 10:08 AM
  #28  
devongarver
5th Gear Member
 
devongarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,994
Default

OP-
Just out of curiousity, where do you attend school, and what type of program are you enrolled in?> I assume its obviously automotive related, but specifically? I always wanted to get in to electrical in the auto industry somewhere, as I have an electronics degree/background, but the money just isnt enough to justify me going back to school again.
devongarver is offline  
Old 09-11-2009, 10:12 AM
  #29  
WhiteFoxGT
Resident Ford Troll
 
WhiteFoxGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Delaware
Posts: 6,717
Default

Originally Posted by devongarver
OP-
Just out of curiousity, where do you attend school, and what type of program are you enrolled in?> I assume its obviously automotive related, but specifically? I always wanted to get in to electrical in the auto industry somewhere, as I have an electronics degree/background, but the money just isnt enough to justify me going back to school again.
stay far far away from the auto industry if your trying to make money. Ask me how I know. I just quit my Ford job after 3 years...
WhiteFoxGT is offline  
Old 09-11-2009, 10:19 AM
  #30  
devongarver
5th Gear Member
 
devongarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,994
Default

ouch....where you working now>?
Was it just the bones..or the enviroment/politics bullshiit?
devongarver is offline  


Quick Reply: dyno numbers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 PM.