Mach only dyno'd @ 277 rwhp & 296 ft/lbs [sadface]
11-11-2010, 04:33 PM
#1
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 4,083
Mach only dyno'd @ 277 rwhp & 296 ft/lbs [sadface]
Asked a few forums, just trying to get as much input as possible. I posted this in the Mach section as well but figured I'd get more responses/opinions/advice here.
Took the Mach 1 in yesterday to get it dyno tuned. I don't have many power modifications, but I figured a tune never hurts anyways.
- Dyno Jet
- 65 degrees
- I don't know if it was SAE corrected (says CF: SAE Smoothing = 0)
Modifications:
- Magnapack catback
- VRS o/r x-pipe
- JLT ram air intake
- PHP intake spacer
- FRPP 4.10s
A couple of things brought to my attention are:
1. Doesn't have as much power as other graphs I've seen with same mods or less. (I know each dyno and car is different, so that's not my biggest concern)
2. One person mentioned that it seems the car is taking a long time to build up power.
3. The turbulence in the graph.
Made 277 rwhp and 296 ft/lbs
Took the Mach 1 in yesterday to get it dyno tuned. I don't have many power modifications, but I figured a tune never hurts anyways.
- Dyno Jet
- 65 degrees
- I don't know if it was SAE corrected (says CF: SAE Smoothing = 0)
Modifications:
- Magnapack catback
- VRS o/r x-pipe
- JLT ram air intake
- PHP intake spacer
- FRPP 4.10s
A couple of things brought to my attention are:
1. Doesn't have as much power as other graphs I've seen with same mods or less. (I know each dyno and car is different, so that's not my biggest concern)
2. One person mentioned that it seems the car is taking a long time to build up power.
3. The turbulence in the graph.
Made 277 rwhp and 296 ft/lbs
11-11-2010, 06:52 PM
#3
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 4,083
Discovered why the graph is so rough. That what the SAE smoothing is. If its set to something like 3, you have a prettier, straighter line, but mine is set to 0. Learn something new every day!
11-12-2010, 05:33 AM
#5
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 570
Sounds about right IMHO. There is too much dyno graph BS out there and it has everybodys expectations skewed. 5 years ago 280RWHP got 11 second times but now 300RWHP similar cars only turn mid 12s.........
11-12-2010, 08:45 AM
#8
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yadkin, Nc
Posts: 5,183
You aint kidding, seems like alot just add power now. theres some guy on corral that dyno'ed 288rwhp and ran like 11.94 all motor. now thats impressive.
11-12-2010, 09:25 AM
#9
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: al
Posts: 17
go to track
My Supercharged 347(10lbs boost) only made 418/432....but on a Mustand MD240...DynoJet made 496/512....both days wer 92+ temp and 75%+ humidity(south AL) however, it was 110hp stronger than my buddies 04 cobra w pulley,cai,long tubes,exh sys!! The MD240 is usually 14-16% stingier than dynojets.....I would think your #'s are fine....RUN IT AT THE TRACK AND QUIT CRYING!
11-12-2010, 09:34 AM
#10
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 10,551
To me, his numbers seem very low though for a dyno jet, that is un corrected for SAE figures(assuming 0- no data filtering). If it WAS SAE corrected than it is near what it should be, if not then he is about 30HP shy of what pretty much everyone with a bolt on mach is dynoing. While I dont get hung up with dyno numbers, its tuff to ignore the "standard" numbers that almost everyone gets in a situation like this.