4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Compression test results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 31, 2011 | 06:50 PM
  #1  
jvog's Avatar
jvog
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,825
From: PA
Default Compression test results

#1: 143
#2: 138
#3: 135
#4: 130
#5: 138
#6: 125
#7: 140
#8: 138

The numbers are low, but within a reasonable range of each other. I forget exactly what my tuner calculated my engine compression to be, so I have to run these numbers by him tomorrow to see what he thinks but I figured I'd get some opinions from you guys.

Also, the spark plugs from cylinders 5 and 8 were covered in oil. The seats for the plugs were covered in oil, and it looks like some oil from an intake manifold leak is what got into cylinder 5 and kinda looks like a slight valve cover leak got into cylinder 8. Is it possible for oil to get into the plug seat area and get down through the threads until the end of the plug? I wouldn't think so, but I'm not sure.

Ripped into my blower today also, and found that my seals have gotten worse. There is a good amount of oil in there. Also, there are some fine metal shavings in the blower output as well as my TB. Not a lot, but some none the less. Zero impellar play still though. Regardless, time to go T trim.
Old May 31, 2011 | 09:10 PM
  #2  
PurpleIcedGT's Avatar
PurpleIcedGT
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,028
From: New Jersey
Default

Take that blower and sell it for a couple packs of Bubbalicious. Glad to hear you are finally coming to some sort of resolution on whats holding this thing back on power!
Old Jun 1, 2011 | 11:11 AM
  #3  
jvog's Avatar
jvog
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,825
From: PA
Default

Yea, I am trying anyway. Bump for more input
Old Jun 1, 2011 | 11:37 AM
  #4  
SVTeeshirt's Avatar
SVTeeshirt
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,955
From: Maryland
Default

not exactly on topic but i got my car compression tested with the ford tech softwear wtfever its called, and it just showed lost power on each cylinder, based on factory guidelines i guess. The biggest loss i had was 6% on 5 the rest were 2% or nothing.

pretty good for a motor with 160k+ on it.
Old Jun 1, 2011 | 01:53 PM
  #5  
Romer's Avatar
Romer
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 155
From:
Default

Originally Posted by jvog
#1: 143
#2: 138
#3: 135
#4: 130
#5: 138
#6: 125
#7: 140
#8: 138

The numbers are low, but within a reasonable range of each other. I forget exactly what my tuner calculated my engine compression to be, so I have to run these numbers by him tomorrow to see what he thinks but I figured I'd get some opinions from you guys.

Also, the spark plugs from cylinders 5 and 8 were covered in oil. The seats for the plugs were covered in oil, and it looks like some oil from an intake manifold leak is what got into cylinder 5 and kinda looks like a slight valve cover leak got into cylinder 8. Is it possible for oil to get into the plug seat area and get down through the threads until the end of the plug? I wouldn't think so, but I'm not sure.

Ripped into my blower today also, and found that my seals have gotten worse. There is a good amount of oil in there. Also, there are some fine metal shavings in the blower output as well as my TB. Not a lot, but some none the less. Zero impellar play still though. Regardless, time to go T trim.

I had about 160 on all cylinders except 1 on my old engine when it was around 45k miles. It was also supercharged.
Old Jun 1, 2011 | 09:58 PM
  #6  
WhiteFoxGT's Avatar
WhiteFoxGT
Resident Ford Troll
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,723
From: Delaware
Default

Originally Posted by SVTeeshirt
not exactly on topic but i got my car compression tested with the ford tech softwear wtfever its called, and it just showed lost power on each cylinder, based on factory guidelines i guess. The biggest loss i had was 6% on 5 the rest were 2% or nothing.

pretty good for a motor with 160k+ on it.
its called IDS noob, and the test is for relative compression.

anyway, vogel, #s do seem a bit low brah. could be some iffy ring sealing issues, along with oil on the sparkplugs. What do you have for a pcv setup?
Old Jun 1, 2011 | 10:50 PM
  #7  
Bman2000's Avatar
Bman2000
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,501
From: oregon
Default

i had 165ish all around at 90k non sc. only rebuilt because of spun bearing. Those are low. likely means your rings are tired and if you are replacing lots of oil, like a quart a month or something, and you arnt leaking it, its likely burning it up thats doing it. meaning...sorry to say you should probebly consider a rebuild during the upgrade. Of course thats assuming you havnt changed your compression ratio to begin with. And with metal shavings in the motor, that increases wear quite a bit. Id try and find out where it came from, but its likly already going through your motor. Better safe than sorry.
Old Jun 1, 2011 | 11:11 PM
  #8  
jvog's Avatar
jvog
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,825
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by WhiteFoxGT
its called IDS noob, and the test is for relative compression.

anyway, vogel, #s do seem a bit low brah. could be some iffy ring sealing issues, along with oil on the sparkplugs. What do you have for a pcv setup?
I've got 18cc dish pistons so I knew my shortblock would be lower compression. Now whether or not this would show up in this kind of test or not IDK.

Originally Posted by Bman2000
i had 165ish all around at 90k non sc. only rebuilt because of spun bearing. Those are low. likely means your rings are tired and if you are replacing lots of oil, like a quart a month or something, and you arnt leaking it, its likely burning it up thats doing it. meaning...sorry to say you should probebly consider a rebuild during the upgrade. Of course thats assuming you havnt changed your compression ratio to begin with. And with metal shavings in the motor, that increases wear quite a bit. Id try and find out where it came from, but its likly already going through your motor. Better safe than sorry.
Its a newish motor brah, my rings better not be tired lol. The small metal shavings/specs are from my blower no doubt.
Old Jun 2, 2011 | 06:17 AM
  #9  
uberstang1's Avatar
uberstang1
Chupacabra
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,621
From: wilkes-barre PA
Default

Originally Posted by SVTeeshirt
not exactly on topic but i got my car compression tested with the ford tech softwear wtfever its called, and it just showed lost power on each cylinder, based on factory guidelines i guess. The biggest loss i had was 6% on 5 the rest were 2% or nothing.

pretty good for a motor with 160k+ on it.
Something about the 96-98 teksids, they just don't wanna die. I friend of mine just ripped down his motor for a build in his 97, the car had 156k on it and all the bearings and engine internals looked BRAND new.
Old Jun 2, 2011 | 09:11 AM
  #10  
jlc41's Avatar
jlc41
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 333
From: Mississippi
Default

Jvog, did you do a wet compression test also. That would help you see if your rings are gone or your valve seals are shot. Or may be you need a complete rebuild.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 PM.