4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

I got my stang dyno'd

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 03:19 PM
  #1  
EddyG's Avatar
EddyG
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 282
From: North carolina
Default I got my stang dyno'd

Ok so i got my mustang Dyno'd at Pro Dyno today.

it put down 281rwhp and 318rwtq

everything went well and they helped me out really good.

i found out my car had a vacuum leak and before it was fixed it put down 267rwhp and 296rwtq

i know they say numbers vary from dyno to dyno but do these numbers seem right??
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 03:26 PM
  #2  
Kerns's Avatar
Kerns
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,478
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

Seems pretty accurate to me, maybe slightly low but well within reason. Typically heads/cams cars are going to make in the 280-290 range. I would expect yours being an NPI car to begin with being slightly higher because of the bump up in compression over a 99-04 motor. I personally would have expected around 295rwhp, but like I said, you're numbers are well within reason.
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 03:29 PM
  #3  
Rockwell28's Avatar
Rockwell28
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,452
From: TEXAS
Default

So those numbers were basicly reached with a full PI swap,cai, and exhaust mods in a nutshell?
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 03:40 PM
  #4  
EddyG's Avatar
EddyG
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 282
From: North carolina
Default

Originally Posted by Rockwell28
So those numbers were basicly reached with a full PI swap,cai, and exhaust mods in a nutshell?
yes but the pi heads were polished and the cam is a comp stage 1. does not have a full exhaust yet. i will be getting some headers shortly
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 04:35 PM
  #5  
Rockwell28's Avatar
Rockwell28
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,452
From: TEXAS
Default

Originally Posted by EddyG
yes but the pi heads were polished and the cam is a comp stage 1. does not have a full exhaust yet. i will be getting some headers shortly
Oh ok I gotcha either way damn good n/a numbers compared to those things stock. looks more like mild bolt on mach1 dyno numbers IMO . Congrats!!!!!!

Last edited by Rockwell28; Feb 7, 2012 at 04:37 PM.
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 06:29 PM
  #6  
trailor's Avatar
trailor
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 664
From: NOLA
Default

seems kinda high to me actually considering you're pretty much a very mildly cammed new edge with a few bolt-ons, but I'm sure cleaning up the heads helped a bit too. congrats!
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 07:17 PM
  #7  
EddyG's Avatar
EddyG
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 282
From: North carolina
Default

Originally Posted by trailor
seems kinda high to me actually considering you're pretty much a very mildly cammed new edge with a few bolt-ons, but I'm sure cleaning up the heads helped a bit too. congrats!
Yea thanks and everyone that has an sn-95 please do this mod. May be a bit pricey but so worth it.
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 07:29 PM
  #8  
97stanger's Avatar
97stanger
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,769
From: NJ
Default

congrats, now look into boost!
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 08:47 PM
  #9  
EddyG's Avatar
EddyG
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 282
From: North carolina
Default

Originally Posted by 97stanger
congrats, now look into boost!
Yea I'm looking into a vortech v-1 t trim. But I also love the whipple or kenne bells. Don't know what to get though. Might go with the vortech. Cause the whipple and kenne bells are pretty expensive.
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 09:31 PM
  #10  
TRUEBLUE3934's Avatar
TRUEBLUE3934
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,481
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by trailor
seems kinda high to me actually considering you're pretty much a very mildly cammed new edge with a few bolt-ons, but I'm sure cleaning up the heads helped a bit too. congrats!
^^^^ This is pretty much what I was thinking too. The 281rwhp sounds close to right, but the torque numbers seem unusually high. It is making its power lower in the rpm range so it makes higher torque numbers. EXCELLENT numbers for those mods!!!

Keep in mind that every dyno is different, so that could have some impact here.
Are these the SAE corrected numbers? If so, what were the raw uncorrected numbers?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 PM.