4.6L V8 Technical Discussions Any questions about engine, transmission, or gearing can be asked here!

Considering Cams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 10:38 AM
  #1  
Starfire's Avatar
Starfire
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 775
From: Chicago Burbs
Default Considering Cams

Right now I'm running the stage 2 Saleen from Brenspeed, about 7.5-8PSI boost, and have been thinking of getting the detroit rockers, now I do drive my car ALOT, and one of my reasons to get the stage 2 was to stay a bit lower on the boost, would cams effect the reliability at all? Such as cold starts, to much power, etc.

I have 3.73s so I don't see a problem with low rpm driving.
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 12:26 PM
  #2  
outceltj's Avatar
outceltj
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,267
From: IN
Default

I have the saleen and the detroit rockers and my car runs fine. At start up it will come up to 900 rpms and then back around 550 and then maintain around 750. I have not had any problems with cold starts. I do know that when i had the supercharger isntalled brent told me that if my car died more than twice in a week to call them and they would fix the idle. Mine has died maybe twice and i have had the supercharger since the first week of december. THe rockers are not the blower grind if u were wondering.
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 03:34 PM
  #3  
Starfire's Avatar
Starfire
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 775
From: Chicago Burbs
Default

You have damn near the same setup as I have the extreme intake also with the 3.6. Any reason why you went with the non blower cams? Also just curious what did you dyno at?

Thanks!
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 07:59 PM
  #4  
outceltj's Avatar
outceltj
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,267
From: IN
Default

Originally Posted by Starfire
You have damn near the same setup as I have the extreme intake also with the 3.6. Any reason why you went with the non blower cams? Also just curious what did you dyno at?

Thanks!
well when i got the cams I was thinking of staying NA but then i thought if i were to dump that much money for longtubes I might as well use that for a supercharger. Just poor planning on my part. my numbers are 438 hp and 406 torque
Old Feb 25, 2011 | 03:37 PM
  #5  
Throck!'s Avatar
Throck!
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 36
From: Wyoming
Default

I just installed the detroit rocker s/c grind on my car a couple weeks ago, so far I like them.

Cold start is like with stock cams.
Dyno shows low end has a little less power (still spin tires in 2nd if I want to). High end doesn't level off around 5k rpms like stock cams, so they pull harder on top.
The throttle response is quicker, unless it's in the tune.

I have been able to get it to buck and surge, but you have to be in a higher gear and around 500 rpm (trying to keep it quiet in the neighborhood until the mufflers came in).

I went from 429 rwhp to 454 wrhp (installed LT headers at the same time though, so not sure the increase is completely due to cams).

Aside from the sound, another pleasant surprise is my car shakes a little now too.

I see you've installed headers...cams are much easier to install, just get the right tools, took about an hour/side for me. And if I had it to do over again, I think I'd disconnect the starter and alternator leads in order to move the looms completely out of the way.
Old Feb 26, 2011 | 01:43 PM
  #6  
case ace's Avatar
case ace
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 148
From: Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by Throck!
I went from 429 rwhp to 454 wrhp (installed LT headers at the same time though, so not sure the increase is completely due to cams).
Are you saying your gain from BOTH, LT Headers AND Cams was 25rwhp combined?
Old Feb 28, 2011 | 02:14 PM
  #7  
Throck!'s Avatar
Throck!
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 36
From: Wyoming
Default

That's what the dyno graph said. I don't think they changed the timing and fuel curves for the cams, maybe a good dyno tune will make a difference. It's at 450 at sea level, so that's about all I need. I'm also at about 6000' elevation, maybe the 'extreme' elevation may throw a wrench into the correction equations.
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 09:25 AM
  #8  
madmann26's Avatar
madmann26
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 189
From: Georgia
Default

The cams would not affect the reliability if tuned properly.
Old Mar 8, 2011 | 04:30 PM
  #9  
Throck!'s Avatar
Throck!
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 36
From: Wyoming
Default

Just to clarify, (and restore reputation of these cams?) They say they usually gain much more power than they did for me, and don't change MPG.

I recently found and fixed a vacuum leak which change the running characteristics. Maybe this leak snowballed in the ECU and caused power/MPG issues...it did fix the idle issue.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
Dec 19, 2023 01:12 PM
patchshaffer
Tuner Central
3
Oct 5, 2015 02:24 PM
uedlose
The Racers Bench
4
Oct 1, 2015 08:31 PM
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
Sep 28, 2015 10:53 AM
Ryan Fitzpatrick
New Member Area
3
Sep 14, 2015 02:21 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 PM.