4.6L V8 Technical Discussions Any questions about engine, transmission, or gearing can be asked here!

Cats

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2017 | 07:27 PM
  #1  
rocky321's Avatar
rocky321
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 211
Default Cats

08 GT from new. 270,000 miles. Original cats. No codes, no issues. Do they stay or do they go?
Old Jun 11, 2017 | 12:41 PM
  #2  
Urambo Tauro's Avatar
Urambo Tauro
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 939
From: SE Michigan
Default

Keep 'em!
Old Jun 12, 2017 | 04:09 AM
  #3  
Dino Dino Bambino's Avatar
Dino Dino Bambino
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,620
From: Cyprus (EU)
Default

What he said. Unless you're having ***** trouble , my advice is to keep the existing cats.
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 04:13 PM
  #4  
rocky321's Avatar
rocky321
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 211
Default

Originally Posted by Dino Dino Bambino
What he said. Unless you're having ***** trouble , my advice is to keep the existing cats.
Love ***** trouble!
Old Jul 20, 2017 | 07:36 PM
  #5  
danzcool's Avatar
danzcool
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,071
From: CA
Default

They are no longer providing any benefit, all the catalyst has been used up. If you're not getting any trouble codes, might as well keep 'em for legal compliance (depending on where you live). If you're a greenie and are worried about polluting (you picked the wrong car, but...), replace them with a CARB compliant CATs.
Old Jul 20, 2017 | 08:03 PM
  #6  
imp's Avatar
imp
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 849
From: AZ
Default

'08 uses full monitoring of HO2S sensors, and I suspect if the catalyst was "used up", all kinds of dopey codes would be thrown. imp
Old Jul 21, 2017 | 04:38 AM
  #7  
Dino Dino Bambino's Avatar
Dino Dino Bambino
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,620
From: Cyprus (EU)
Default

Originally Posted by danzcool
They are no longer providing any benefit, all the catalyst has been used up. If you're not getting any trouble codes
If the cats weren't functioning correctly, the downstream O2 sensors would have triggered a code.
Old Jul 21, 2017 | 03:19 PM
  #8  
danzcool's Avatar
danzcool
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,071
From: CA
Default

I'm just saying... I've seen the tailpipe emissions readings of a well tuned car without any cats, and a well maintained 10 year old vehicle with stock cats. The car with cats did not have the cleaner emissions. Also, there is a reason that the warranty on the cats, while longer than the powertrain warranty, ends before the 8th year.
Old Jul 22, 2017 | 05:08 AM
  #9  
Dino Dino Bambino's Avatar
Dino Dino Bambino
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,620
From: Cyprus (EU)
Default

Originally Posted by danzcool
I'm just saying... I've seen the tailpipe emissions readings of a well tuned car without any cats, and a well maintained 10 year old vehicle with stock cats. The car with cats did not have the cleaner emissions.
We're the NOx emissions also measured or was it only the HC and CO?
Old Jul 22, 2017 | 08:02 AM
  #10  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Default

Originally Posted by danzcool
I'm just saying... I've seen the tailpipe emissions readings of a well tuned car without any cats, and a well maintained 10 year old vehicle with stock cats. The car with cats did not have the cleaner emissions.
That's neither here not there.

At best, it says that it's possible at that particular moment for a single car without cats to meet test standards for which the mfrs have had to go to cats in order to guarantee meeting them long term for the entire fleet.


Also, there is a reason that the warranty on the cats, while longer than the powertrain warranty, ends before the 8th year.
Warranty lengths - or on the flip side, component design to reliably exceed some specified warranty period by "X" amount - is determined by the mfr's desire to minimize warranty expense.

This is most likely some bell curve/statistical thing, where the warranty length corresponds to some number of standard deviations on the low side from some estimated mean time to the inability to pass testing. As a crude example, at 3 standard deviations, you'd have to plan on having to replace converter(s) on about 150 out of every 100,000 cars. Plus probably a few more than that due to damage caused by other emissions-related failures.

Which (especially for OP) says nothing about how long any cats that have lived as long as his have might still be good for. They might be good for nine more years and another quarter million miles, or they might die over the next couple of weeks.


Norm

Last edited by Norm Peterson; Jul 22, 2017 at 08:07 AM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 PM.