5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

86 GT 5 speed Vs. 99 dakota 5.9r/t?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 11:29 PM
  #1  
frdmstng1986GT's Avatar
frdmstng1986GT
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,518
From: Alton, New Hampshire
Default 86 GT 5 speed Vs. 99 dakota 5.9r/t?

my sisters friend just got this 99 dakota r/t. it has exhaust and and cold air intake... he wants to race my 5.0 when i get the clutch in it.. all i got is exhaust and intake.. and a lil bit of timming adjustment.. anybody know what these trucks run?... and.. if i got a chance? my quickest time at the track so far has been a 15.3 at 92 mph with no traction through 1st.. judging by my 2.6 60 foot times.
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 11:36 PM
  #2  
HACKGT350's Avatar
HACKGT350
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,635
From: new jersey
Default RE: 86 GT 5 speed Vs. 99 dakota 5.9r/t?

i do believe you can drive circles around him. my moms jimmy was able to keep up with one till 3rd
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 11:55 PM
  #3  
hellas85stang's Avatar
hellas85stang
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,082
From: texas
Default RE: 86 GT 5 speed Vs. 99 dakota 5.9r/t?

5.9s are pretty tough...like 280-300 hp with a few mods... has i think a 360 in it...there pretty heavt but id be carefull
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 12:20 AM
  #4  
frdmstng1986GT's Avatar
frdmstng1986GT
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,518
From: Alton, New Hampshire
Default RE: 86 GT 5 speed Vs. 99 dakota 5.9r/t?

hmmm really?.. i knew they were quick for a truck.. but i wasnt sure.. well.. maybe when i do the clutch i will do the gears at the same time... maybe that will help out a lil.
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 01:05 AM
  #5  
scottistang's Avatar
scottistang
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 87
From: Essex Ma
Default RE: 86 GT 5 speed Vs. 99 dakota 5.9r/t?

I used to have a 99 Dakota R/T with True dual flowmaster exhaust, cold air intake and a chip and i would run 15.5's at the track all day long spinning the tire for about 80 feet. Track was never good on street nights so i never really got to hook up and make a solid run. Tried easing into the gas leaving but it still ran about the same if not slower so i would just put it to the floor. But yeah they are pretty quick but you shoudl def be able to beat it. I have a 89Lx now with a few engine mods and 3.73's and i know it feels faster than the Dakota.
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 01:06 AM
  #6  
gspfunk's Avatar
gspfunk
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,834
From: Texas
Default RE: 86 GT 5 speed Vs. 99 dakota 5.9r/t?

In stock form, the 5.9's are piggish (read that as bottled up), but mods wake them up pretty quick. The r/t will have a lot more power than you, but he's also got at least 700 #'s on you, too. My friends 3.9 v6 dakota weighs 4k, so the larger motor and whether it's extended cab will add more to it.

You should beat him, but the driver mod is always a factor.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lethaldosage423
Archive - Parts For Sale
1
Oct 19, 2015 12:12 AM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
10
Oct 3, 2015 06:23 AM
uedlose
The Racers Bench
4
Oct 1, 2015 08:31 PM
BeatnikFink
New Member Area
6
Oct 1, 2015 08:00 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 PM.