5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

engine question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 12:59 AM
  #1  
SPE926's Avatar
SPE926
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 691
From:
Default engine question

what cars other than the mustangs came with the HO version of the 5.0?
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 01:01 AM
  #2  
frdmstng1986GT's Avatar
frdmstng1986GT
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,518
From: Alton, New Hampshire
Default RE: engine question

the lincoln mark VII's and the 89-93 t-birds too had them... some older crown vic cop cars had them.
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 01:11 AM
  #3  
SPE926's Avatar
SPE926
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 691
From:
Default RE: engine question

are u sure the t birds are not the e6 version?
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 01:13 AM
  #4  
mrbigshot's Avatar
mrbigshot
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 845
From:
Default RE: engine question

the birds were not ho's. to my knowlage only the mark VII had ho's. the difference between a ho and a standard is cam and intake, the pistons were still 9.1 but not forged.
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 01:14 AM
  #5  
frdmstng1986GT's Avatar
frdmstng1986GT
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,518
From: Alton, New Hampshire
Default RE: engine question


ORIGINAL: SPE926

are u sure the t birds are not the e6 version?
yep, i'm posative. i have a 92 t-bird sport in my front yard forsale.. still the same everything i think as a regular 5.0 except it has the sn95 intake style.. the "e6" version was only in 86.. lol.. wich sucks cause it's what i got on my mustang.[]
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 01:16 AM
  #6  
frdmstng1986GT's Avatar
frdmstng1986GT
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,518
From: Alton, New Hampshire
Default RE: engine question


ORIGINAL: mrbigshot

the birds were not ho's. to my knowlage only the mark VII had ho's. the difference between a ho and a standard is cam and intake, the pistons were still 9.1 but not forged.
pretty sure the mn12 chassis t-bird had the 5.0 ho... since i got an all stock 92 sport that has a 5.0 ho in it.... it was a lil under rated then the mustang 5.0 though.. rated at 200hp and 275ft/lbs.
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 01:16 AM
  #7  
mrbigshot's Avatar
mrbigshot
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 845
From:
Default RE: engine question

the sn95 intake makes 10hp less than the standard ho intake. the standard 5.0 was 215hp, thats what the tbird has in it
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 01:41 AM
  #8  
SPE926's Avatar
SPE926
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 691
From:
Default RE: engine question

the e6 model 5.0 was used past 86 in cars other than the mustang, and the hp ratings in 94/95 are not lower than the fox hp ratins in fact they are higher because ford changed how it rated hp in 93
93 gt was rated at 205
94/95 was rated at 215
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 01:50 AM
  #9  
mrbigshot's Avatar
mrbigshot
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 845
From:
Default RE: engine question

and the 87-92's were 225
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 02:29 AM
  #10  
86 5.0L's Avatar
86 5.0L
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,882
From: San Diego, CA
Default RE: engine question

ORIGINAL: frdmstng1986GT
the "e6" version was only in 86.. lol.. wich sucks cause it's what i got on my mustang.[]
DAMN YOU FORD!!!.......

but not for long MUAHAHAHAHA, trickflow here I come.....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 PM.