5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

stance question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 02:36 AM
  #1  
dimebag's Avatar
dimebag
Thread Starter
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,357
From: earleville md
Default stance question

ok my mustang looks like it sits a little lower in the back then it does in the front. im wondering if this is normal or if its from worn out shocks? regardless i think it makes the car look bad *** and is a more agressive stance for it. so question is, if it is worn out components, is there a way to replace things and keep that lower stance in the back. unless this is normal...
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 02:42 AM
  #2  
90gt831's Avatar
90gt831
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 96
From: salinas, cali
Default RE: stance question

PUT UP SOME PICS!!!!!
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 02:43 AM
  #3  
AdderMk2's Avatar
AdderMk2
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 22,374
From: Lil' Rhody
Default RE: stance question

[sm=ttiwwp.gif]
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 02:45 AM
  #4  
randy78045's Avatar
randy78045
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,054
From: Laredo, TEXAS
Default RE: stance question

Mine looks the same way an i have new shocks in the rear... strange 10 way adjustables... may for that, but i doubt it...
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 02:46 AM
  #5  
dimebag's Avatar
dimebag
Thread Starter
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,357
From: earleville md
Default RE: stance question

yea yea yea i coulda guessed id get that. but its 1245 here, which means its dark which equals no pics till tomorrow. sorry and thanks guys... ill have pics tm. but does anyone have any side views of their cars? something for me to compare to
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 02:46 AM
  #6  
89GTRed's Avatar
89GTRed
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,228
From:
Default RE: stance question

if anything it would be your springs. Thats what determines how high it sits not your shocks. They just help the load from making you bounce all crazy when the load gets put on your springs.
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 02:49 AM
  #7  
dimebag's Avatar
dimebag
Thread Starter
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,357
From: earleville md
Default RE: stance question

ok my bad, wrong part, lol. so springs... i assume wear out over time?
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 03:01 AM
  #8  
91stang's Avatar
91stang
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,860
From:
Default RE: stance question

ORIGINAL: dimebag

yea yea yea i coulda guessed id get that. but its 1245 here, which means its dark which equals no pics till tomorrow. sorry and thanks guys... ill have pics tm. but does anyone have any side views of their cars? something for me to compare to
east coast representing
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 03:07 AM
  #9  
dimebag's Avatar
dimebag
Thread Starter
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,357
From: earleville md
Default RE: stance question

hellz yea. lol
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 03:22 AM
  #10  
mrmeaner5.0's Avatar
mrmeaner5.0
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3
Default RE: stance question

i'm new to this sita and also mustangs so i'm gonna need some help to see what i can do to make this thing faster it has an intake and ECU, and cobra Z rated tires its a 1991 5.0 convertible...not sure where to start so if you can help me start with the cheapest and most gain for the money i'm good with mechanics but i have been working on imports what will be my best bet for more power and less money to start with?

please help me make this a fast car!!!(not that it isnt allready but my father has a 66 skylark with a 470 and i want to beat him...lol)

any help would be helpful

[IMG]local://upfiles/48878/354609026CCB4228965E07E8E2387B6B.jpg[/IMG]



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 PM.