5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Turbocharger vs Supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 4, 2007 | 02:39 AM
  #51  
85GTsleeper's Avatar
85GTsleeper
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,294
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Default RE: Turbocharger vs Supercharger

i didnt say we invented it where did that come from [&:]. im saying it was used alot with muscle cars and ricers caught on how is that going back to wwII
Old May 4, 2007 | 02:40 AM
  #52  
dimebag's Avatar
dimebag
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,357
From: earleville md
Default RE: Turbocharger vs Supercharger

thats why im going turbo
Old May 4, 2007 | 02:41 AM
  #53  
85GTsleeper's Avatar
85GTsleeper
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,294
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Default RE: Turbocharger vs Supercharger

good point...
Old May 4, 2007 | 02:54 AM
  #54  
90mustang5.8's Avatar
90mustang5.8
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,921
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Default RE: Turbocharger vs Supercharger

JMO if you go supercharged get a KB.....but if you go turbo make it worth while and twin turbo it like SSkiller did. Im truely in love with the sound of the turbos blow off the line.....supercharges sound nice too but after hearing them alot it get kinda annoying.









.................................btw how much are twins like 10 g's or something?
Old May 4, 2007 | 04:25 PM
  #55  
dimebag's Avatar
dimebag
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,357
From: earleville md
Default RE: Turbocharger vs Supercharger

uh... you can get just as much outa a single turbo set up as you can a twin. what the MAIN differance is is spool up time. twins spool faster.
Old May 4, 2007 | 04:56 PM
  #56  
AndySpeed's Avatar
AndySpeed
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 618
Default RE: Turbocharger vs Supercharger

hey i got a question. Before i spend all this time installing my D-1 procharger, should i sell it and buy a KB for my 347stroker? can someone give me opinions on watch kb and alll would be goo for 12-18pounds.. 12pounds for now and 18 for next winter on a new motor.
Old May 4, 2007 | 05:53 PM
  #57  
BascoSauce's Avatar
BascoSauce
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 285
From:
Default RE: Turbocharger vs Supercharger

to answer ur question i think u should go with the KB....you're gonna reach 120 easy, besides they sound sick and with all that torque, nothin will touch u off the line, and if ur not lookin to go passed 120, just put in high gears with a twin screw and ur set! not much will touch u with that 347!
Old May 4, 2007 | 06:13 PM
  #58  
91bigredgt's Avatar
91bigredgt
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 117
Default RE: Turbocharger vs Supercharger

the thing i dont like about nitrous is that its not constantly there, with a turbo or supercharger as long as everything is in good shape u can pull that extra power at any given time and not have to hit a button or watever and realize o im outta n2o opps lol but yeah the import crowd really took the nitrous thing and blew it up with Fast and the Furious
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
Dec 19, 2023 01:12 PM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
Oct 1, 2015 09:21 AM
col2560
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
3
Sep 25, 2015 08:59 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 AM.