94 computer problems
02-16-2009, 07:38 AM
#14
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,926
A computer is a computer, it does what is programmed to do....... the SN95 is no different in that respect. Are they different than the GUFB or fox units?... yep, and the tuner needs to know those differences. The SN95 ECM also has other features (like datastream capabilities) to help in the tuning process more effectively than a fox ECM. IOW.....all those "kinks" are the tuner's responsibility to iron out..... BTSTDT. It is easy to blame parts when they are not understood.
02-16-2009, 04:40 PM
#19
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 8,467
man the 94/95 computers are not that big of a deal. The difference between the SN95 and fox computers is like the same thing as the sn95 vs foxbody weight differences. It's no big deal but people make it into something huge.
Just wondering, what do you mean you had "a chip burned for your car?" Was the car dyno tuned or logged while driving and adjusted, or did you tell the guy what your car had and he put it in a chip and said here you go? How much time was spent in the actual burning process?
Just wondering, what do you mean you had "a chip burned for your car?" Was the car dyno tuned or logged while driving and adjusted, or did you tell the guy what your car had and he put it in a chip and said here you go? How much time was spent in the actual burning process?
02-16-2009, 04:43 PM
#20
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: virginia
Posts: 272
the car was logged with actually driving time and adjustments made. about 6 hours all in all was spent on the tune. no dyno tuning was done because that doesn't account for real time driving. and it was an sct 4 bank chip