Which is better?
#11
RE: Which is better?
^^^You fail at life^^^
In all seriousness though, I wouldn't do a SC. I'm very bias towards turbo's as they have proven to be much better in what I want to use the car for. And yes, I've done roots, twin screw, centrifugal, single turbo and twin turbo vehicles, and I have been much happier with single turbo systems.
In all seriousness though, I wouldn't do a SC. I'm very bias towards turbo's as they have proven to be much better in what I want to use the car for. And yes, I've done roots, twin screw, centrifugal, single turbo and twin turbo vehicles, and I have been much happier with single turbo systems.
#15
RE: Which is better?
ORIGINAL: .boB
It all depends on what you're going to do with it. FI is not good on a road racing or conebashing car. But, it's great on a drag car.
It all depends on what you're going to do with it. FI is not good on a road racing or conebashing car. But, it's great on a drag car.
#16
RE: Which is better?
ORIGINAL: TRexGAWD
What? Please explain on how you think it's not good for AutoX. Unless you mean big turbo. Other than that blowers will provide great low end torque to power out of turns much better than N/A will for a fraction of the cost.
ORIGINAL: .boB
It all depends on what you're going to do with it. FI is not good on a road racing or conebashing car. But, it's great on a drag car.
It all depends on what you're going to do with it. FI is not good on a road racing or conebashing car. But, it's great on a drag car.
They are not good on a road course for two reasons. First, FI can be very difficult to tune correctly for the broad operating range. If you have lots of money to hire pros, then you can make good power. Second, heat soaking is a real problem there. Your lap times will gradually decrease as things get hotter.