AWD Mustang?
I was thinking it would be cool to build an awd mustang. First you would need an awd system to swap into the fox. the only car I could come up with that had awd around the same time the fox was out was the 87 to 91 tempo/topaz. The tempo was avialile with a 2.3 but im not shure if its the same as the fox mainly I just was wondering if anyone knows if the bell housing bolt pattersare the same. I know the tempo has the engine mounted transversly so It would probably only be possible with the 2.3. Aso wondering if anyone knows if they make a tempo/topaz awd manual, and how strong the drivetrain is.
i say screw that awd BS. 1/8 difference between the tires and you got smoke clutches!
those awd exploders are garbage, screw that!
you cant even put different tires on it, it all makes a difference. no thanks!
those awd exploders are garbage, screw that!
you cant even put different tires on it, it all makes a difference. no thanks!
find me a rag top mustang with a body like a fox. I don't get why you are you shoot down an Idea like this there are already very fast 2.3 liter mustangs out there and no one tells them to go buy a 240. AWD is diffrent but not bad If you want to do more that drive down the quarter mile.People swap 302's for a 351W's all the time mabie they should have bought a camero.
ORIGINAL: DietrichVR4
find me a rag top mustang with a body like a fox. I don't get why you are you shoot down an Idea like this there are already very fast 2.3 liter mustangs out there and no one tells them to go buy a 240. AWD is diffrent but not bad If you want to do more that drive down the quarter mile.People swap 302's for a 351W's all the time mabie they should have bought a camero.
find me a rag top mustang with a body like a fox. I don't get why you are you shoot down an Idea like this there are already very fast 2.3 liter mustangs out there and no one tells them to go buy a 240. AWD is diffrent but not bad If you want to do more that drive down the quarter mile.People swap 302's for a 351W's all the time mabie they should have bought a camero.
It's ford's fault that we never got the glorious 5.8l Windsor block as a stock option (would have been badass). But an AWD mustang... thats just wrong!
ORIGINAL: DietrichVR4
find me a rag top mustang with a body like a fox. I don't get why you are you shoot down an Idea like this there are already very fast 2.3 liter mustangs out there and no one tells them to go buy a 240. AWD is diffrent but not bad If you want to do more that drive down the quarter mile.People swap 302's for a 351W's all the time mabie they should have bought a camero.
find me a rag top mustang with a body like a fox. I don't get why you are you shoot down an Idea like this there are already very fast 2.3 liter mustangs out there and no one tells them to go buy a 240. AWD is diffrent but not bad If you want to do more that drive down the quarter mile.People swap 302's for a 351W's all the time mabie they should have bought a camero.
Pie in the sky kid, pie in the sky. Its fun to dream.


