5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

Explorer/Mountaineer 302 differences?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2010, 10:06 AM
  #1  
P Zero
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
P Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,986
Question Explorer/Mountaineer 302 differences?

Hey fellas (and ladies), I'm going to be either rebuilding a 302 I got for my Ranger or buying a new (used) one. However, I'm not sure about the differences between the Mustang 302's and Explorer/mountaineer ones.

Here's what I already know:
Mustang 302 HO: Has forged pistons (depending on year), roller cam, uses 351 firing order.

Explorer/Mountaineer: Hypereutectic pistons, rolloer cam, 302 firing order, GT40P heads.

Now what I would like to know is, are the main cam journals the same diameter as the HO motors?
I saw in '98 the Explorer 302 had 3 production date breaks, anyone know what those are about?

And if there is anything anyone else can think of, please let me know.

Thanks all.
P Zero is offline  
Old 10-06-2010, 10:22 AM
  #2  
tohoopty
4th Gear Member
 
tohoopty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: point pleasant,west virginia
Posts: 1,212
Default

idk if their is anything diff about them or not but i got a 96 explorer motor in mine and i got a trickflow cam in it that has the h.o firing order and i also converted it to carb with no problems at all.
tohoopty is offline  
Old 10-06-2010, 10:30 AM
  #3  
P Zero
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
P Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,986
Default

Originally Posted by tohoopty
idk if their is anything diff about them or not but i got a 96 explorer motor in mine and i got a trickflow cam in it that has the h.o firing order and i also converted it to carb with no problems at all.
Thanks man.So it appears the cams are the same.
Did you use the exploder heads? And if so, did the exhaust bolt right up?
P Zero is offline  
Old 10-06-2010, 11:06 AM
  #4  
tohoopty
4th Gear Member
 
tohoopty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: point pleasant,west virginia
Posts: 1,212
Default

yeah i used the gt40's that came with the motor and exhaust bolted right up.
tohoopty is offline  
Old 10-06-2010, 04:55 PM
  #5  
sn95_331_GT_ yellow
5th Gear Member
 
sn95_331_GT_ yellow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 2,394
Default

the exploder 302's use the 302HO/351W firing order.

biggest difference is the exploders using a crank trigger vs a dist.

and a 289 block is a 302 block is a 351W block. they all have the same cam bearings, the only difference is the 351W using a 3" main bearing vs a 2.248" and (depending on the year) the lifters being able to accept hyd. roller lifters.
sn95_331_GT_ yellow is offline  
Old 10-06-2010, 11:04 PM
  #6  
P Zero
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
P Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,986
Default

Originally Posted by sn95_331_GT_ yellow
the exploder 302's use the 302HO/351W firing order.

biggest difference is the exploders using a crank trigger vs a dist.

and a 289 block is a 302 block is a 351W block. they all have the same cam bearings, the only difference is the 351W using a 3" main bearing vs a 2.248" and (depending on the year) the lifters being able to accept hyd. roller lifters.
Is there a spot to put the disty in the exploder blocks?

As for the 289/302/351 thing, the 351 is a slightly different block. Taller deck height, wider intake etc.
But good to know that pretty much everything else is the same. Appreciate the help.


Now.........does anyone have a mild street cam for sale?

EDIT:
Originally Posted by tohoopty
yeah i used the gt40's that came with the motor and exhaust bolted right up.
Awesome, so now I wont have to buy new headers. Thanks again man.
P Zero is offline  
Old 10-06-2010, 11:33 PM
  #7  
tohoopty
4th Gear Member
 
tohoopty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: point pleasant,west virginia
Posts: 1,212
Default

yes there is a spot for a dizzy
tohoopty is offline  
Old 10-07-2010, 04:31 PM
  #8  
sn95_331_GT_ yellow
5th Gear Member
 
sn95_331_GT_ yellow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 2,394
Default

Originally Posted by P Zero
As for the 289/302/351 thing, the 351 is a slightly different block. Taller deck height, wider intake etc.
^^^^^
i know...

and it also uses 1/2" head bolts vs 7/16", the dist. has a wider base, the oil pumps are different, and like i stated all but one model are just for hyd. flat cams.
sn95_331_GT_ yellow is offline  
Old 10-10-2010, 03:24 PM
  #9  
lxman1
4th Gear Member
 
lxman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Louisville, Ky.
Posts: 1,326
Default

I run a 96 Explorer engine with a TrickFlow Stage one cam. The 96 used GT40 heads like the 93 Cobra. The 97-98 used the GT40P heads which require different headers.
lxman1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bradleyb
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
11-27-2015 07:50 PM
Dokilar
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
15
10-16-2015 08:13 PM
bradleyb
California Regional Chapter
0
10-01-2015 01:02 AM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
1
09-30-2015 10:13 AM



Quick Reply: Explorer/Mountaineer 302 differences?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 PM.