Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

347 vs 351W

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 15, 2006 | 04:30 PM
  #1  
want_66fastback's Avatar
want_66fastback
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 153
From:
Default 347 vs 351W

OK, I guess I will open Pandora’s box here....this can be quit a passionate discussion here Which do you all think is the better engine. The 347 stroker or the 351W? Which one last longer if both were pushing lets say 350 hp….and lets assume the 347 stroker was built in a Mexican block, not the standard run of the mill 5.0 block.
Old May 15, 2006 | 04:36 PM
  #2  
Soaring's Avatar
Soaring
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
Default RE: 347 vs 351W

With the extra nickel content, that Mexican block is hard to beat.
Old May 15, 2006 | 04:38 PM
  #3  
myshifter's Avatar
myshifter
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,364
From:
Default RE: 347 vs 351W

the 347 will last forever in any production block at 350hp level, depending on many factors mainly what its going in and the intended use, I would opt for the 347.
Old May 15, 2006 | 07:13 PM
  #4  
usmcdevilmp's Avatar
usmcdevilmp
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 143
From:
Default RE: 347 vs 351W

if its going into a 64-66, then the 347 will have a bit more room to work with between the shock towers too.
Old May 15, 2006 | 07:26 PM
  #5  
Decurion's Avatar
Decurion
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 432
From: The unemployment epicenter, Detroit, MI
Default RE: 347 vs 351W

mark another one for the 347. nearly the same power curves, and 125 lbs lighter, along with more clearance in small cars.
Old May 15, 2006 | 09:35 PM
  #6  
want_66fastback's Avatar
want_66fastback
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 153
From:
Default RE: 347 vs 351W

Yeah but isn't a 351W more durable than a 347 stroker?
Old May 15, 2006 | 10:03 PM
  #7  
JBradley500's Avatar
JBradley500
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 614
From: UPSTATE NEW YORK
Default RE: 347 vs 351W

not if the 347 is built by someone who knows what they are doing. in the past 5 years the 347 has become a real engine that you can drive with no worries with all the advancement with the stroker kits and builders doing more of them.
Old May 16, 2006 | 01:30 AM
  #8  
NTIMID8's Avatar
NTIMID8
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 73
From: United States
Default RE: 347 vs 351W

At the 350hp level your not going to hurt either one. The 351 will make more power easier but will also get worse gas mileage. The 351 block and crank are strong units. The 351 is my favorite motor.However the 347 will give you more intake options, especially the "EFI" route. And definetly more room in the engine bay. Really its a matter of what are you going to do with your car. I think if its a performance situation then gas mileage is pretty much null so I would go the 351 route. To make it simple you can't make tons of HP and expect the best gas mileage, unless its fuel injected that helps.
Old May 16, 2006 | 02:45 AM
  #9  
Scott H.'s Avatar
Scott H.
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,445
From:
Default RE: 347 vs 351W

Kind of like comparing apples and oranges in my opinion. Now if you'd said; compare a 347 stroker to a 427 stroker (based on 351W block), it would be more even-up.
Otherwise (IMO) it depends on the year of the Mustang. short deck block for '65-'66, or any pre-'71 Mustang you plane to road race, and tall deck, or big block for '67-'73 street/strip car.
Then back to short deck block through the MII and Fox body years.
With the right knowledge pretty much any engine can be built to be reliable. Just takes the right builder, with the right plan, processes and parts.
Old May 16, 2006 | 07:13 AM
  #10  
65_2plus2's Avatar
65_2plus2
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 392
From: Arizona Desert
Default RE: 347 vs 351W

With out a doubt, the 347 offers more power, more room and less weight that its 351 counterpart in a 65-66 mustang. In a 67-70 I may opt for a modified 351 for more potential power.

Chrees…..[sm=icon_cheers.gif]



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 PM.