Cam specs
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 755
From: North Idaho
Cam specs
I would like to know what some of you think about this cam as far as it's specs and how you think it would be performance wise. Would you use it in a 289/302 if you were rebuilding with HP in mind, but going to use as a daily driver?
[IMG]local://upfiles/26569/07356D3C55104C15A7EB2B426BD6B437.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/26569/E6D4224C09684B088D41459DE7BD6300.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/26569/07356D3C55104C15A7EB2B426BD6B437.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/26569/E6D4224C09684B088D41459DE7BD6300.jpg[/IMG]
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 755
From: North Idaho
RE: Cam specs
ORIGINAL: myshifter
its pretty tame but has the needed duration on the exhaust side if you are using a stock iron head. Ford iron heads are terrible, minus the C head
its pretty tame but has the needed duration on the exhaust side if you are using a stock iron head. Ford iron heads are terrible, minus the C head
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 512
From:
RE: Cam specs
Specs on that cam look to be very similar to the edelbrock Performer RPM cam. Therefore a good mid range/ daily driver cam. However, keep in mind that Edelbrock recommends either a manual trans, or bigger rear end gearing and mild stall for their cam. Not sure about the rest of your the setup. You mentioned you ahve larger intake valves, what about the exhaust side? Surely you havent gone larger in the intake and left the exhaust valves stock??
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 755
From: North Idaho
RE: Cam specs
ORIGINAL: fast66
Specs on that cam look to be very similar to the edelbrock Performer RPM cam. Therefore a good mid range/ daily driver cam. However, keep in mind that Edelbrock recommends either a manual trans, or bigger rear end gearing and mild stall for their cam. Not sure about the rest of your the setup. You mentioned you ahve larger intake valves, what about the exhaust side? Surely you havent gone larger in the intake and left the exhaust valves stock??
Specs on that cam look to be very similar to the edelbrock Performer RPM cam. Therefore a good mid range/ daily driver cam. However, keep in mind that Edelbrock recommends either a manual trans, or bigger rear end gearing and mild stall for their cam. Not sure about the rest of your the setup. You mentioned you ahve larger intake valves, what about the exhaust side? Surely you havent gone larger in the intake and left the exhaust valves stock??
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
Sep 28, 2015 10:53 AM