Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

289 vs 302 vs 351W

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 09:50 AM
  #1  
65StangFB's Avatar
65StangFB
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 185
From: Lakeland, Fl
Default 289 vs 302 vs 351W

All,
Forgive me for I am new at the forum, but I was hoping you could help. I am rebuilding my 65 fastback and I am trying to determine what engine to drop in it. I want to have more performance but dont want to make a lot of modificationes to the car. If I were to drop a 1969 351W into this car, are there any modifications I need to consider? Also If I purchase a long bloack engine what is compatible with by 289 (Oil pan, valve covers, timing coveres)? I would appreciate any insight.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 09:57 AM
  #2  
andrewmp6's Avatar
andrewmp6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,162
From:
Default RE: 289 vs 302 vs 351W

a 351w will fit you just gotta buy the right headers and its a tight fit i wouldnt take anything off the 289 just keep it the way it is so you can put it back later if you want
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 11:42 AM
  #3  
my77stang's Avatar
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,007
From: Citrus County, FL
Default RE: 289 vs 302 vs 351W

since the 351's are a squeeze in the early model stangs, i would either

a) build the 289 - i promise you you'll be happy
b) store the stock 289, and build a 302/347 stroker (if your really wanting the cubes)
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 02:51 PM
  #4  
Brandontyler65's Avatar
Brandontyler65
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,845
From:
Default RE: 289 vs 302 vs 351W

get the 289 and build it up you will be happy don't go for the 302-347 setup
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 03:04 PM
  #5  
grruminator78's Avatar
grruminator78
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,413
From: florida
Default RE: 289 vs 302 vs 351W

what's wrong with the 347?
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 03:30 PM
  #6  
gothand's Avatar
gothand
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,287
From: North Fulton, GA
Default RE: 289 vs 302 vs 351W

How much power are you looking to achieve? You can pretty easily get 350+ hp by either rebuilding your 289 with or buying a crate 302 with aluminum heads, performance cam,intake,carb and some headers. FWIW, I pulled the 351W out of my '65 Fastback and put in a crate 302 w/375hp. The 351W made gobs of torque but the tight squeeze just made it too much of a pain for my tastes.

People here swear by the stroker, but it would certainly cost more than having your 289 rebuilt and beefed up.

Good luck.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 03:43 PM
  #7  
ih8chevy's Avatar
ih8chevy
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,305
From: west chester
Default RE: 289 vs 302 vs 351W

the 351w is for a motor that u want to make more than 500 hp, the block on the 302 can only hold about 450 wheel, b4 it splits. the 289 is a great motor, there are lots of parts for it and it will last forever, as well as rev forever. so i would just say rebuild and remake the 289 and u will be happy.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 04:00 PM
  #8  
my77stang's Avatar
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,007
From: Citrus County, FL
Default RE: 289 vs 302 vs 351W

agreed. 289's are sexy..... its just a good number lol
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 05:41 PM
  #9  
superdavid's Avatar
superdavid
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,494
From:
Default RE: 289 vs 302 vs 351W

If you're not racing, go with the 289. If you hate getting beat outa stop lights, drop ina 351 or a stroker, or ideally a stroked 351.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 06:06 PM
  #10  
65StangFB's Avatar
65StangFB
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 185
From: Lakeland, Fl
Default RE: 289 vs 302 vs 351W

Im not looking for a ton HP, but I would like a bit. Heres the issue. At first I will be keeping it fairly stock. What started my interest is that I can get a 302 long block alot less than a 289 long block ($1000- vs $1500). I am trying to keep it fairly inexpensive, but get the most HP. The 351W long block runs about $1200 (less than the 289 as well)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04 AM.