Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

grammar

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 08:52 PM
  #1  
mayh3m's Avatar
mayh3m
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 374
From: new orleans
Default grammar

It's time we get this straightened up. It urks the crap out of me when people don't know the difference between their, there, they're, to, too, its and it's.

Their - reference to someone's property - Where is their 67 Mustang?
There - reference to general location - The 67 Mustang is over there.
They're - abbreviation for they are - They're getting the 67 Mustang today.

They're on their way to get the 67 Mustang over there.

To - usually connects subject to predicate - They are going to pick up the 67 Mustang.
Too - used in agreeance with, additional, also - He is going with them, too.

He is going to get the mustang, too. He too will be there to get it.

Its - possessive, ownership (no apostrophe, unlike other possessive words) - The 67 Mustang is on its way.
It's - it is - It's time to go get the 67 Mustang.

End of lesson.
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 08:54 PM
  #2  
ponyx2's Avatar
ponyx2
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 208
From:
Default RE: grammar

I is be going over they're to be seein my mushtang. Trust me...it irks the hell outta me too.
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 08:55 PM
  #3  
mayh3m's Avatar
mayh3m
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 374
From: new orleans
Default RE: grammar

Old Apr 20, 2007 | 09:09 PM
  #4  
Soaring's Avatar
Soaring
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
Default RE: grammar

Yeah, this isn't English class and you are not going to educate proper grammar on this site. I totally agree with you, but again, this is not the place to educate about proper grammar. Some of the worst cases actually post some of the best information. You just have to sift through all the bad grammar to understand what they are saying.
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 09:15 PM
  #5  
baddog671's Avatar
baddog671
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,736
From: MD/WV
Default RE: grammar

Glen, weren't you a teacher or something at one time?
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 09:16 PM
  #6  
longlive289s's Avatar
longlive289s
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 934
From: Kirkland, WA
Default RE: grammar

ya i fell into the bad grammer phase due to constent text messaging and forums. i've been trying to clean it up but hard to get out of old habits such as: u, ne way, rolf, ftw...and all that jazz. the o/t section rots your brain[8D]
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 09:27 PM
  #7  
66GTKFB's Avatar
66GTKFB
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,623
From:
Default RE: grammar

If I received a message, memo or letter from a subordinate written in the manner that some of these post are composed, there would bemanditory schooling to make English the primary language for that employee - or the door. In a post about a week or two ago, there was someone from New Caladonia that apologized for the poor English used in their posts saying the written word was easier than the spoken. All the messages were easily understood. To that party, thank you. But I guess it's a reflection of today -
Jim
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 09:31 PM
  #8  
ponyx2's Avatar
ponyx2
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 208
From:
Default RE: grammar

My bwain is NOT be roten!
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 09:39 PM
  #9  
mat11089's Avatar
mat11089
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 702
From:
Default RE: grammar

This isnt school.Although it may be difficult get over it or dont read it.
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 09:44 PM
  #10  
BlackLX's Avatar
BlackLX
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,576
From:
Default RE: grammar

ORIGINAL: longlive289s
rolf, ftw
See, those are different because they're acronyms. They're perfectly fine to use.


ORIGINAL: longlive289s
s such as: u, ne way,
These on the other hand, are annoying and make you look like a 12 year old girl that talks on AIM too much.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 AM.