Stance?
6th Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
RE: Stance?
ORIGINAL: JMD
What do you think?
What do you think?
Norm
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 205
From: Vancouver, WA
RE: Stance?
ORIGINAL: 73 Sportroof
I like the back a little high. it looks more aggressive. I would leave it the way it is.
[IMG]local://upfiles/70187/8343863A05B746AC88CA5B8638BC08F2.jpg[/IMG]
I like the back a little high. it looks more aggressive. I would leave it the way it is.
[IMG]local://upfiles/70187/8343863A05B746AC88CA5B8638BC08F2.jpg[/IMG]
you know.... I like that look I think going back to the original car, if you were to lower the rear a little bit and put larger tires/wheels on the rear only, to keep the stance it has. it would look really good.... imo
1st Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 75
From:
RE: Stance?
I also think it needs to come down 3" at the rear and 2" at the front.Also the wheels appear to have the wrong backspacing beacuse they look like they are outside the fenders.If you are keeping those wheels then I guess you need to have the car sit up that high.
It's your choice. Each to his own.
This is where mine sits and I'm happy with it.New reverse eye lafs and 1 1/2" lowered front coils.
It's your choice. Each to his own.
This is where mine sits and I'm happy with it.New reverse eye lafs and 1 1/2" lowered front coils.
1st Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 75
From:
RE: Stance?
If the fenders can't go down without hitting the top of the tyre I would say it's not ideal backspacing on the wheels.I would also say it isn't that safe or roadworthy.
There's nothing wrong with big rubber on the back. That is achievable with the 4 1/4" or 4 1/2" backspacing on the wheels.Or a narrower diff.
If the wheels protrude outside the fender then the track of the car has been altered as well.
Just my thoughts.Your car needs to be how you like it,not others.The worst thing anyone can do is keep changing things to please others when it doesn't please themselves.
There's nothing wrong with big rubber on the back. That is achievable with the 4 1/4" or 4 1/2" backspacing on the wheels.Or a narrower diff.
If the wheels protrude outside the fender then the track of the car has been altered as well.
Just my thoughts.Your car needs to be how you like it,not others.The worst thing anyone can do is keep changing things to please others when it doesn't please themselves.
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 512
From:
RE: Stance?
ORIGINAL: texasbluesdownunder
If the fenders can't go down without hitting the top of the tyre I would say it's not ideal backspacing on the wheels.I would also say it isn't that safe or roadworthy.
There's nothing wrong with big rubber on the back. That is achievable with the 4 1/4" or 4 1/2" backspacing on the wheels.Or a narrower diff.
If the wheels protrude outside the fender then the track of the car has been altered as well.
Just my thoughts.Your car needs to be how you like it,not others.The worst thing anyone can do is keep changing things to please others when it doesn't please themselves.
If the fenders can't go down without hitting the top of the tyre I would say it's not ideal backspacing on the wheels.I would also say it isn't that safe or roadworthy.
There's nothing wrong with big rubber on the back. That is achievable with the 4 1/4" or 4 1/2" backspacing on the wheels.Or a narrower diff.
If the wheels protrude outside the fender then the track of the car has been altered as well.
Just my thoughts.Your car needs to be how you like it,not others.The worst thing anyone can do is keep changing things to please others when it doesn't please themselves.