Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Engine-289 to 302

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 06:03 PM
  #11  
fweidner's Avatar
fweidner
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 12
From:
Default RE: Engine-289 to 302

Thanks for the input

Fred
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 07:30 PM
  #12  
my77stang's Avatar
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,007
From: Citrus County, FL
Default RE: Engine-289 to 302

if your going to stroke it (larger than a 302) grab a 302 block from the junk yard, they can be had for next to nothing and you can get yourself into a later model roller block with a better design rear main seal.

if the choice is 289 or 302 stick with the 289. im rebuilding my motor now and am going from a 302 down to a 289 because of the better stroke/rod length ratio
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 08:10 PM
  #13  
musting's Avatar
musting
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 69
From:
Default RE: Engine-289 to 302

the 289 have close chamber heads if you rebuild them and open up and port match the ports, bore the block 030 over ad a bit more agressive cam,4-v intake,650 cfm carb,headers,
You will awake the beast within! no need for a 302 .....
I remember back in the early 70's I had a 68 couger 289 and someone had put a set of 302 heads on, the compression was lowered and it just did'nt run good,
so I found a set of stock hp289 heads ran the heJJ out of that thing for couple years outran small block Camaro's /Firebirds, all day long untill I went up against a '68 rt charger with a 440/4 speed.. Thats when I decided to go Mopar,,[sm=gears.gif]
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 09:11 PM
  #14  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default RE: Engine-289 to 302

There's no point in putting that much work into stock heads unless you're trying to keep factory iron heads on there. Aftermarket heads are much more cost effective. You'll likely spend $6-700properly rebuilding and porting factory heads. For a couple hundred dollars more, aftermarket heads willflow better out of the box.
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 09:36 PM
  #15  
htwheelz67's Avatar
htwheelz67
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 572
From:
Default RE: Engine-289 to 302

stock vs stock the 302 makes about 10-15 more hp/tq than the 289, with all your stock stuff even a 351w will work fine, if your going to change engines go a 351w you will feel a huge difference and all the stock stuff can be used except intake, oil pump and oil pan.
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 10:09 AM
  #16  
sixtysix's Avatar
sixtysix
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 324
Default RE: Engine-289 to 302

Wow-lots of different opinions and ideas-my head is spinning-Thanks to all Scott
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 10:49 PM
  #17  
mightythor99's Avatar
mightythor99
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 83
Default RE: Engine-289 to 302

i would leave a 289 a 289,..............you arent going to really gain anything, a few horses, at best..............
boring 60 over,...........i've done that,...........the only thing, is that the piston walls are that much thinner, adn they are a little more sensitive,.............it's just about over at that point,...........it's sleeve time, or junk the block time after that...........happened to me also. many moons ago, i had a motor that had been bored 60 over in my 66 gt,..............she ran like a scalded dog,............was much more powerful then my standard 289..........even though it had a factory cam in it,..............
the problem i had, was i wasnt the smartest guy in the world,.........and i pulled the distributor for some reason,..........and when i was seating it back, they are a little tricky sometimes.......i thought i had it seated, but actually, it just spun/span ??? the oil pump, and ended up blowing my motor.............was a costly lesson, being that i worked at ARBY'S (trademark......those pirates!! ;-) making a whopping $3.35 an hour............... even though people would stand in my line during the rush hour, instead of other people's lines...........it wasnt enough money to fix my motor! ;-)

they liked my jokes i guess, while they were waiting for their food! ha ha

Old Apr 1, 2008 | 10:57 PM
  #18  
67t5ponycoupe's Avatar
67t5ponycoupe
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,946
From: Colorado
Default RE: Engine-289 to 302

Dang dude that thread is 6 months old!
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 11:08 PM
  #19  
67mustang302's Avatar
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,468
From: California
Default RE: Engine-289 to 302

Holy old thread, Batman!!!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Galactic
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
10
Apr 29, 2019 02:56 PM
bradleyb
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
Nov 27, 2015 07:50 PM
bradleyb
California Regional Chapter
0
Oct 1, 2015 01:02 AM
69Volunteer
Classic Mustang General Discussion
1
Sep 30, 2015 10:39 AM
jaiidutch
Motor Swap Section
2
Sep 14, 2015 10:29 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50 AM.