Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

4V Edelbrock ques

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 12:18 PM
  #11  
67mustang302's Avatar
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,468
From: California
Default RE: 4V Edelbrock ques

I'm not sure about the octane rating as far as where fuel is sold, but the volatility is different. Fuel formulated for higher altitudes is designed to be more volitile and combust more readily and more rapidly, whether it's more or less resistant to detonation I'm not sure, but I imagine if it's more volitile it has less detonation resistance. They do that to help make up for power lostfrom reduced combustion due to the thinner air.As far as that 98 octane, you'll be fine on 87 or 89. I was running 89 in my 302 and it has a helluva lot more power than a stock 289/302, the only reason I switched to 91 was that I had a part throttle detonation problem, but if I put some effort into it I could tune that out via ignition/carburetion. With 98/100 octane you could run 11.5:1 compression or a crapload of boost, so unless you have either you're just burning a hole in your pocket
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 12:53 PM
  #12  
symbiote's Avatar
symbiote
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 189
From:
Default RE: 4V Edelbrock ques

yeah..it is a bit dear on my pocket :P...ill try running standard fuel as well..i guess back in the day fuel wasnt as engineered as it is these days..thanks guys!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JonnyBlazeGT
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
3
Nov 3, 2015 01:10 AM
tramphardrocker
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
6
Sep 13, 2015 08:56 PM
YoungStangsMan
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
15
Sep 5, 2015 07:01 PM
dochawk
Classic Mustang General Discussion
7
Aug 25, 2015 08:25 AM
Philhampton1
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
Aug 21, 2015 12:04 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 PM.