Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Optimal 289 upgrade specs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 09:48 AM
  #1  
chalkstang's Avatar
chalkstang
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 8
From:
Default Optimal 289 upgrade specs?

Hi all,

I'm looking to upgrade the 289 in my '66 Fastback. I'd like to get to 300 - 350 horses using the optimal components available today. Assuming I'm starting with a complete stock engine what would a "perfect" spec be? I realize there will be many opinions on this butI'd like to hear what you think. My goal is to select each component very carefully so I make the right decision first time round.

Comments on carbs to exhaust system much appreciated. My goal is to have an original looking carwith some guts under the hood.

I use my car as a weekend driver so I want a good balancebetween power and practicality.

Thanks
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 02:07 PM
  #2  
Mustangdemon67's Avatar
Mustangdemon67
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,115
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default RE: Optimal 289 upgrade specs?

well, like a few guys on here have stated before, safety should be done first. i would say put some money into suspension and brakes. power discs in the front are great and maybe some suspension upgrades (new leaf sprigs, shocks all that good stuff). as for motor upgrades, you gota look at the whole aspect. finding outthe right combination of certain parts is what gets best results.

300 hp goal out of a 289 is not hard to get. some performance heads, cam and intake will most likely get you there. a nice 4bbl carb would be good too. im notreally gona get into detail about carb size and cam lift etc, i guess it depends on what your going to use the car for and how often. (more of your preference)

also if your going to be pushin 300+, i would say get a posi third member with maybe a lower gear ratio, thats makes a world of difference.

if your still using the c4, then i would suggest beefing it up a litte. maybe kevlar bands/clutches, a diff vavle body, shift kit etc..

and exhaust, what ever you get is fine. as for headers, i personally like tri y;s, they are great street headers.
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 04:14 PM
  #3  
ninteen66mustang's Avatar
ninteen66mustang
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 923
From: Colorado
Default RE: Optimal 289 upgrade specs?

in terms of exhaust my personal favorite is flowmasters. youtube it, they sound great.
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 05:28 PM
  #4  
wrenchturner75's Avatar
wrenchturner75
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 313
From: pa
Default RE: Optimal 289 upgrade specs?

i love my super 40s! lets my cleve breathe real nice.
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 06:25 PM
  #5  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default RE: Optimal 289 upgrade specs?

Just to add an opinion, I generally do not like the sound of 40-series Flowmaster mufflers. They're obnoxiously loud, and everyone has them. I've got a set of their Hushpower II's and I love them. They don't drone like the 40's generally do, they're not as deafening inside the car, and they sound incredible, especially above 3k. They're expensive, but I think they're worth it.

Outside of Flowmaster, one of my friends has some Dynomax mufflers on his Chevelle that have a really nice tone to them.
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 06:58 PM
  #6  
chalkstang's Avatar
chalkstang
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 8
From:
Default RE: Optimal 289 upgrade specs?

Thanks for all the info. Re the headers I think I'll go for tri-y's. Didn't the original Shelby GT350's come with tri-Y's? Also, what about pipe size? Is 2inch ok for a 289 or do you recommend something larger?
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 07:13 PM
  #7  
Oxnard Montalvo's Avatar
Oxnard Montalvo
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
From: 1984
Default RE: Optimal 289 upgrade specs?

I like the Ford 4100 carburetor and stock manifold. The carburetor is reliable and belongs on the car. IMHO If you're going to drive a Ford it should be a Ford. The GT40 heads are much better flowing than the original ones and are again Ford. I'm sure Ford has the right cam too.
Upgrading to a dual master cylinder is an easy, inexpensive safety improvement that will let you tap that 300hp with confidence.
Doing the Shelby drop and adding a bigger front sway bar in conjunction with new rear springs and poly bushings will also give you much better handling.

'66 Fastback cruising Boston.
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 07:15 PM
  #8  
fast66's Avatar
fast66
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 512
From:
Default RE: Optimal 289 upgrade specs?

Have a look at the edelbrockRPM power package. It will get you where you want to be, with proven results. You "could ' select some different component to give yoi a slightly better result, but Edelbrock has done all the work for you.
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 07:52 PM
  #9  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default RE: Optimal 289 upgrade specs?

Yes, the 65-66 GT350's came with tri-y's from the Shelby plant. For a 289, 2-1/4" pipe should be just fine. More than that is overkill, unless you're spending a lot of time at high revs.

While I generally like the Autolite 4100 carbs, I wouldn't use one on a 300hp 289 build. The stock 1.08 model is ideal on a stock engine, and the 1.12 version works well on slightly modified engines, but I'd want something more tuneable for a serious power build.

I definitely have to recommend against a factory manifold. Cast iron is HEAVY. You can easily shave a good 30lbs off the front end by switching to an aluminum intake, and unlike the factory cast manifold,it will support the increased rpm range that will be required to make all that power.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
baddog671
Archive - Parts For Sale
20
Jul 26, 2016 01:20 PM
PaulH2
Members Rides and Car Show Section
20
Jan 31, 2016 09:48 AM
Boostaddict
Lethal Performance
0
Oct 1, 2015 08:58 AM
Boostaddict
3.7L V6 S550 Tech 2015 - 2017
0
Oct 1, 2015 08:57 AM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
1
Sep 30, 2015 10:13 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 AM.