Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

289 or 302

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 09:32 PM
  #1  
66fastback's Avatar
66fastback
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8
Default 289 or 302

Well let me first say that my original "bad" buy isn't so bad as I look into it more. what was a gt 350 clone with a bad rings and a few bad frame spots. is really a 66 fastback original 4 sp car with the original motor and trans and on top of that it I got the title back and it has 74000 original mile. So i am much happier about my ford now. However brings me to motor I will be rebuilding the original to its original condition, so in the mean time i will be putting in another motor. My question is one is there a differanc e between the 302 and 289 in my original post a guy said there is only a harmonic balancer differance is that is? and can i go with a 87 or newer rollar motor? i see alot of them around. thanks

Joe

[IMG]local://upfiles/15479/6967C7515F8C496D8BCA9A5CFBF8E9F5.jpg[/IMG]
Old Apr 16, 2005 | 12:21 AM
  #2  
Wessy's Avatar
Wessy
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 97
From:
Default RE: 289 or 302

I don't know the diff. between a 289 and 302 except 4 cu. in. I think the stroke is lil shorter or something too. as for putting a roller engine in there's no prob. with that. A roller engine only changes the heads, cam, tappets, and rockers; it has nothing to do with the block so all the mounts and what not should be the same.
Old Apr 16, 2005 | 12:41 AM
  #3  
69FECoupe's Avatar
69FECoupe
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 686
From:
Default RE: 289 or 302

I've been following your post's regarding your engine problem. Have you done a compression test? If it's good, you may just need a new set of valve seals. If it's the original motor, and it's never been rebuilt, they are probably hard and cracked. I've seen them actually break apart and partially block the oil returns causing the oil to puddle in the head and cause alot of smoke when hot. Just throwing it out there.
Old Apr 16, 2005 | 03:36 AM
  #4  
fats429's Avatar
fats429
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 381
From: Philly. PA.
Default RE: 289 or 302

well thare is a coupple difffernaces mostly inside the block . 66 is close to when they changed the bolt pattern on the back of the block from 5 to 6 bolts . all 302 are a 6 bolt pattern and all 260CID and lower arre 5 bolt . 289 is the olny windsor block that has 5 & 6 bolt bellhouseing pattern

from the top of the motor to the top of the starter on the passanger side thare olny 2 bolts on a 5bolt bell houseing and 3 on a 6 bolt bellhousing

B/W
keep the 66 heads they will bolt to the 302 . the newer roller blocks have *** for heads the 66 289 are way better for proformanace than the post 1970's . you will gain a full point in compression with the older head
Old Apr 16, 2005 | 09:48 AM
  #5  
69FECoupe's Avatar
69FECoupe
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 686
From:
Default RE: 289 or 302

Are you sure about the starter bolt numbers? IIRC, the only early Ford motors I've seen three a bolt starter on is an FE or maybe a six.
Old Apr 16, 2005 | 01:34 PM
  #6  
Soaring's Avatar
Soaring
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
Default RE: 289 or 302

The 289 and the 302 share the same block. The only real difference is the stroke. The 289 is 4.00x2.87 and the 302 is 0.130 longer stroke.
Old Apr 16, 2005 | 09:10 PM
  #7  
fats429's Avatar
fats429
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 381
From: Philly. PA.
Default RE: 289 or 302

ORIGINAL: 69FECoupe

Are you sure about the starter bolt numbers? IIRC, the only early Ford motors I've seen three a bolt starter on is an FE or maybe a six.
Not the bolts in the starter, the bellhouing bolts above the starter . 2 = 5 bolt bell & 3 = 6 bolt bell
Old Apr 16, 2005 | 09:20 PM
  #8  
69FECoupe's Avatar
69FECoupe
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 686
From:
Default RE: 289 or 302

Sorry, I misunderstood.
Old Apr 16, 2005 | 10:04 PM
  #9  
281GT's Avatar
281GT
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 864
From:
Default RE: 289 or 302

Basic physics indicates that the 302 has a little more performance potential. The additional 13 cubic inches that come from the increase stroke length will yeild more torque. I'd go with a 302.
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 01:29 AM
  #10  
66FordStang's Avatar
66FordStang
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 81
From:
Default RE: 289 or 302

Im not sure,maybe someone can clear this up. I heard that the earlier 302 (69-73) were the strongest of the years and much stronger then a 289 block. It has something to do with cylinder wall thickness. The 289's cylinder is not not that thick and can not take as much heat. Again, i heard this from many places and people but do not know this for sure.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 PM.