Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

anyone have a block?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 11:03 AM
  #1  
built67's Avatar
built67
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 404
From: ny
Default anyone have a block?

i am starting an engine build for my 67 coupe. anyone have an old block thats in good shape they wanna get rid of? 302 or 351 let me know what u have!

thanks,

chris
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 11:33 AM
  #2  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

I'd grab a 5.0 roller block out of a fox body, pickup, or lincoln. Some of those mid-to-late 80's 5.0 blocks used low-tension piston rings, so you might even find one that still has the cross-hatch marks on the cylinder walls
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 01:18 PM
  #3  
Stepman's Avatar
Stepman
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,090
From: Az
Default

Where you at? I have a complete 302 and think I have a block from 65 too. Don't want to be shipping though, not worth it.
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 05:20 PM
  #4  
built67's Avatar
built67
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 404
From: ny
Default

i live on long island, new york...yeah i hear to 5.0 blocks from the 80's aren't bad to use. any opinions?
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 07:51 PM
  #5  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

I recommend those blocks because they're set up for use with a roller cam. It's easier to make more power without sacrificing driveability with a roller cam, and they're less hassle concerning break-in and maintenance due to current low-zinc oils. And like I said, some of those engines used low-tension piston rings that put very little wear on the cylinder walls, meaning that they usually require minimal boring.
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 08:08 PM
  #6  
my77stang's Avatar
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,007
From: Citrus County, FL
Default

don't be a p*ssy, use your 289 its a better motor anyways if your looking at 302's. now if you get a 351, thats another story.

/thread
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 09:21 PM
  #7  
Tang 72's Avatar
Tang 72
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 152
From: Orlando, FL
Default

why would a roller 302 be any worse than a 289 my77stang??? its almost the same thing, the biggest difference is just the longer stroke... nothing wrong with getting something that is newer, set up for a roller cam, and super super easy to find... and i have a complete 302 sitting in my garage but i live in Florida so its not worth shipping, lol.
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 06:21 AM
  #8  
built67's Avatar
built67
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 404
From: ny
Default

im not using my 289 bc i am driving the car while i am building a new motor for it on the side, and i think my 289 might be original so i am taking it out and putting it in the corner or my shed and calling it a day. i never knew that not using a 289 makes you a p*ssy...huh i guess im behind on the "forum trash talking" lingo
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 06:37 AM
  #9  
gibsonxplayer88's Avatar
gibsonxplayer88
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 153
From: Illinois
Default

hey.. i have a 289
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 08:28 AM
  #10  
built67's Avatar
built67
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 404
From: ny
Default

i never said anything bad about them, i like 289's im just looking for something bigger, my77stang says im a p*ssy for not using mine lol



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 AM.