Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

So what's wrong with this ad!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 09:19 PM
  #1  
fakesnakes's Avatar
fakesnakes
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,839
From: Connecticut
Default So what's wrong with this ad!!!

http://www.autotraderclassics.com/details?adId=90473060
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 09:25 PM
  #2  
racin66coupe's Avatar
racin66coupe
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,485
From: NH
Default

where should i start? the 14k tag, the fact it has 6500 miles? did the 350's even come in verts?

LOL
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 09:27 PM
  #3  
1slow67's Avatar
1slow67
ROTM Moderator
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,158
From: AL
Default

Originally Posted by racin66coupe
did the 350's even come in verts?
They did.

Only thing I see wrong is the price tag
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 09:28 PM
  #4  
Kale64.5vert's Avatar
Kale64.5vert
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 46
Default

I would say just a zero and comma placement if I was the one selling it.

since I am the one looking, I would say "not a thing!!!"
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 09:34 PM
  #5  
67ragtop's Avatar
67ragtop
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 180
From: Cape Cod
Default

The only thing that jumps out at me is they left a zero off the price. If that were the correct price, the Auto Tarder ad guy would have bought it without the ad being placed!

Fastsnakes, that GT40 sounds mean. What company made the car? Is it street legal?
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 10:08 PM
  #6  
andrewmp6's Avatar
andrewmp6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,162
From:
Default

Its fake or the price is wrong.
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 12:41 AM
  #7  
Stepman's Avatar
Stepman
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,090
From: Az
Default

Well, how picky do you want to get? Other than the obvious wrong price, the description up top says it has an AM radio and a 4 speed. The bottom says it's an automatic with an AM/FM CD custom stereo. Also, I saw no mention of the autograph on the glove box...I would think that is worth a mention. Then there is the whole...that interior looks more green to me than black. I think they got the description mixed up with another car.
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 03:58 AM
  #8  
4reboy's Avatar
4reboy
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,990
From: San Diego, CA
Default

That doesn't look like wimbledon white, looks more like pebble beige to me. Still a nice car if you ask me, if it's a true shelby then definitely wrong price tag. Even if a (nice) clone it is worth a lot more than that.
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #9  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Default

Red flag?
. . . In Shelby registry pages 852 and 945 . . .
Is it proper for one car to show up in two different places in the registry? Either way, I'd want that cleared up.


Norm
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dokilar
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
15
Oct 16, 2015 08:13 PM
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
Oct 5, 2015 07:16 AM
ChampInSD
5.0L GT S550 Tech
13
Oct 2, 2015 04:55 AM
marc954
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
2
Sep 29, 2015 11:18 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 AM.