Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Getting closer, front end pics.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 03:07 PM
  #11  
67 evil eleanor's Avatar
67 evil eleanor
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,106
From:
Default

I think the fenders could be rolled easily enough to accept the tire/rim, better now before the paint. They are 245-45-17 and are the rims are the ones you see in all of the Mustang catalogs (torque thrust D's). They are supposed to be the largest size that will work on a 5-6 without pulling out the welder. I plan to make a fender roler as soon as I can fine a nylon wheel. I have rolled other fenders and was able to move them about an inch without damage and taking them off. Good thing I have some Blue paint left if I screw up.
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 03:08 PM
  #12  
guybored's Avatar
guybored
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 384
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Tony R
That's not a fan it is a propeller to help him go faster.
i wish someone would of told me that before I decided to replace my 200 with a 5.0.
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 03:51 PM
  #13  
1965fastback's Avatar
1965fastback
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 790
From: Arkansas
Default

Lookin good, lookin good!
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 04:06 PM
  #14  
Deviousfred's Avatar
Deviousfred
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 630
From: El Paso, TX
Default

very nice! I've got the same valance waiting to go on mine. can't wait!
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 05:31 PM
  #15  
65rangoon's Avatar
65rangoon
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 675
From:
Default

looks good. the front bumper isnt my cup of tea but the rest looks really nice
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 09:14 PM
  #16  
baddog671's Avatar
baddog671
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,736
From: MD/WV
Default

Ok, I have a question about the fan. I installed a 1970 radiator in my 1967 coupe becuase the original 67 radiators had the outlet on the wrong side (in comparison to my 351W block) and I believe the 70 had +2" surface area. I was able to squeeze a 14" (I think thats what it was) on the front as a pusher, and will later add a 16/17" puller and shroud.

The instructions said use x wire for positive and y wire for negative (for standard puller!) or reverse wiring for puller. So, I did reverse wiring. But, the instructions also said something about you had to remove the fan blades and put them on backwards. My father touched the wires in reverse fashion on a battery for a second, and even though we didn't touch the blades, I felt it throw air onto my hand placed behind it. So, we didn't see the point of the blade-reversal, and it didn't look like it would have been easy to take the blades off.

Do you think this would have any effect? I don't see why it would say to reverse the blades, if it still threw air?? It's mounted now, and I really dont want to have to cut the straps,buy new ones, tear the fan apart, potentially break something, and fiddle with fitting it again...

Nic
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 09:36 PM
  #17  
67 evil eleanor's Avatar
67 evil eleanor
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,106
From:
Default

The only thing I can think of is if its a "S" blade or has a unidirectional fan blade on it. If you turn it over, the "S" would be backwards and may make it move air better. For me, I wanted something to cool down the engine bay (fiberglass hood) after engine shutoff and a secondary means of cooling. I don't expect it to run much. May have to look at the instructions with this unit and see if it says anything about reversal.
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 09:47 PM
  #18  
baddog671's Avatar
baddog671
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,736
From: MD/WV
Default

It does has S-blades, and thats the only thing I could think of, perhaps they are meant to only flow 1 direction. But, like I said, we tapped those wires on a battery and it instantly blew on my hand. Didn't let it get it to full speed though, so I didn't feel the full strength of the flow.

I think I plan on having the larger puller as the main cooling fan since a shrouded puller is better anyways (so I hear), and having the smaller pusher as a secondary unit for higher temperatures. I will have them both on separate adjustable thermostatic regulators...
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 11:09 PM
  #19  
Waffles's Avatar
Waffles
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,553
From: Detroit; where the weak are killed and eaten.
Default

I wanna be your wife.
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 12:04 AM
  #20  
racin66coupe's Avatar
racin66coupe
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,485
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by Waffles
I wanna be your wife.
maybe if you could become a size C atleast... B just aint gunna cut it :P
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zsmart
Convertible Tech
2
Feb 29, 2016 08:33 AM
the5
2005-2014 Mustangs
3
Sep 19, 2015 06:13 PM
Sparks_88
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
0
Sep 8, 2015 01:06 PM
robjh22
Suspension
0
Sep 8, 2015 12:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 AM.