Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

GT 40 HEADS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 02:13 AM
  #1  
XTREMECREATOR's Avatar
XTREMECREATOR
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 16
Default GT 40 HEADS

HI
I got a 69 mustang 302 stock. im trying to get a some more horse power aand i got a gt40 heads i got from the junkyard. what can you guys recomend me to. also i got a freind that can get me edelbrock stuff with a discount. what cam and intake can i use t=with the gt 40s
to get the best gain out of it i would really apreciate all your input thank you.


ps tha engine is new anly about 500 miles on it.

thank you
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 03:02 AM
  #2  
83gtragtop's Avatar
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,897
From: DTLA, CA
Default

Best place to post this would be the 5.0L section.
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 01:41 PM
  #3  
dirtydave289's Avatar
dirtydave289
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 586
From: Newnan, GA
Default

sorry i can't answer your question but how much did you pick the heads up for?
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 01:51 PM
  #4  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

No need for the 5.0 section.

Are they GT40's, or GT40P's? P heads require special headers to clear the spark plugs.

Assuming they're not P heads, I'd recommend an Edelbrock RPM Air Gap, Comp Cams camshaft (not a huge fan of the limited Edelbrock grinds), and a 500-600CFM carb depending on cam selection.

If you can tell us more about your car and driving style, we can recommend a cam for you. Auto or manual? What rear gears do you have/want to run? Do you drive it every day, or only occasionally for fun? Do you do any freeway driving? If so, how much?
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 02:18 PM
  #5  
urban_cowboy's Avatar
urban_cowboy
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,100
From: Texas Hill Country
Default

GT40 heads are generally consider stockers or Janers and do not flow much as they come. They can be worked to get flow, but are basically stock heads otherwise. There is nothing wrong with them, but you are not going to get a bunch of power out of a plane set of GT40 heads. I have a set on my 351W in the '88 Bronco and they are a limiting factor in getting performance. If I every want to shoot for more power, I would need to port and polish the heads and possibly machine for larger valves or just replace them with something was was already ready to go.

As for intakes, I like my Air Gap on the 383W, but it is tall so will not fit underhood in all applications.

Cams...I like my Comp solid roller cam.

Like Star said, if you let us know your targets, we can help a little more

Last edited by urban_cowboy; Jan 12, 2009 at 02:21 PM.
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 02:23 PM
  #6  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

Urban, for 289/302 heads, GT40's are pretty decent:P The reason they're good for the smaller engines is because they basically use 351W port castings without having massive chambers. That's also the reason they're the limiting factor in your Bronco; they're simply not much better than stock 351W heads.
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 02:32 PM
  #7  
urban_cowboy's Avatar
urban_cowboy
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,100
From: Texas Hill Country
Default

Good point. Did not think about the fact that this is for a 302. I am so used to thinking 350-400cid these days.
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 04:40 PM
  #8  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

bah @ you and your monster motor... :P
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 05:03 PM
  #9  
urban_cowboy's Avatar
urban_cowboy
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,100
From: Texas Hill Country
Default

From what I read today, the GT40 heads have 145cc intake runners with 1.84/1.54 valves with a peak in the 187/129cfm range at .5 lift. Seams like performance 302 heads often in the 165cc range with 1.9/1.6 valves with 243/185 flow at .5 lift. Stock 302 heads are 127cc runners with 1.78/1.45 valves with 150/113 flow at .5 lift.

It looks like they are still far from performance heads and could use some tuning to get them going but are better than stockers. Basically stock 351 heads on a 302. Am I wrong?
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 09:28 PM
  #10  
nba1341's Avatar
nba1341
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,246
From: Upland, California
Default

you will notice a big different with the gt40 heads


very good bang for the buck



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 AM.