Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Stroker Fuel System

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 11:17 PM
  #1  
Chaos13's Avatar
Chaos13
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 59
From:
Question Stroker Fuel System

Hi all,

I'm thinking of upgrading to a 347 or perhaps even a supercharged 347. To accommodate an engine this size, I will probably have to upgrade my fuel line to an 3/8 - 1/2" line. I think I want to stick with the stock fuel tank.

Has anyone out there completed this upgrade? What type of sending unit are you using with this set-up? What type of fuel line are you using (braded vs solid)?

Thanks.
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 03:09 AM
  #2  
Mustangdemon67's Avatar
Mustangdemon67
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,115
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

when you say sending unit, are you refering to the pump and fuel reg? or the gas tank sending unit? but if your gona run an electric pump, dont run the line too close to the exhaust, or you will get vapor lock, i learned the hard way
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 05:48 PM
  #3  
Chaos13's Avatar
Chaos13
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 59
From:
Default

I'm thinking about the sending unit at the fuel tank end. If I'm increasing the line diameter, I'm guessing that I also need to increase the diameter of the tubing leading out of the fuel tank.

Is everyone that runs a 1/2" line using fuel cells?

Thanks
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 05:57 PM
  #4  
racin66coupe's Avatar
racin66coupe
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,485
From: NH
Default

1/2 seems like a lot for a 347.... but lets wait and see what some other people are running
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 06:08 PM
  #5  
1slow67's Avatar
1slow67
ROTM Moderator
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,157
From: AL
Default

CPR is running a 349 stroker. So he should be able to help once he gets in here.

Last edited by 1slow67; Feb 22, 2009 at 06:09 PM. Reason: 3000th post !!!!!!!!
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 08:14 PM
  #6  
stangtjk's Avatar
stangtjk
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 398
From: WV
Default

Its more about the amount of power you plan to be making that would influence the fuel line size rather than the size of the engine. If I remember correctly the 5/16 lines are good for 350HP 3/8 will get you to 500+. So unless you're going to putting down close to 600HP or more I think the 3/8 line would be fine.
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 10:20 PM
  #7  
68EFIvert's Avatar
68EFIvert
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 682
From: Washington
Default

I have a 6AN size line with a stock sending unit. My car has over 400 RWHP and is somewhere about 475ish at the crank. No problems with me.
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 03:16 PM
  #8  
urban_cowboy's Avatar
urban_cowboy
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,100
From: Texas Hill Country
Default

I did a basic fuel system upgrade when I installed my 383. What I did was pull the tank, weld in a sump. Then I built a plate and mounted a Barry Grant electric pump. It died shortly after installation, so I now have a Holley black electric fuel pump. In between the pump and the tank, I mounted a canister fuel filter with a braided AN10 fuel line feeding them. From the pump to the front of the car, I ran a braided AN8. The front side of the line terminates into a Barry Grant pressure regulator. From there it goes AN8 to the fuel log. I have a pressure gauge mounted to that to check everything with.
AN Size - Hose OD
AN10 - 5/8"
AN8 - 1/2"
AN6 - 3/8"

Last edited by urban_cowboy; Feb 23, 2009 at 03:19 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brett Ludlow
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
7
Sep 23, 2015 06:59 AM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
Sep 16, 2015 07:53 PM
SteelerNation82
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
1
Sep 16, 2015 07:11 AM
angeljoelv
SVT Forums
0
Sep 10, 2015 09:12 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
Sep 10, 2015 08:39 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 AM.