Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Thermostat Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 2, 2009 | 11:30 AM
  #11  
sschanz's Avatar
sschanz
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 235
From:
Default

So what is the best thermostat to run? 160/180/195?
Old Apr 2, 2009 | 01:04 PM
  #12  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

The OE 192/195 t-stat is ideal, although I like to run a high-flow 195* t-stat. You can get them from Summit. They help improve coolant flow when open, and tend to be more consistent with when they start and finish opening.

If you're overheating with a 195, blame your cooling system, not you thermostat. The t-stat is there to warm the engine up faster and manage the minimum operating temp, not the maximum. That's the job of the rest of the cooling system.
Old Apr 2, 2009 | 01:58 PM
  #13  
st66ng's Avatar
st66ng
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 81
From: Canada
Default

Thanks Guys,

Plenty of knowledge as always, I wish some of you lived next door, but hey this is the next best thing.
Old Apr 2, 2009 | 02:12 PM
  #14  
sschanz's Avatar
sschanz
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 235
From:
Default

When would a person use a 160 or 180?
Old Apr 2, 2009 | 02:30 PM
  #15  
urban_cowboy's Avatar
urban_cowboy
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,100
From: Texas Hill Country
Default

I read an article years ago about horsepower and torque comparisons between thermostat levels. I think different engines and tunes, like running at slightly different temperatures. Lower is not always better. Normal operating temp ranges from 190-210. 195 engine thermometer is about optimum for fuel efficiency. Higher temps are better for emissions and efficiency.

Remember, a 180 thermometer will not keep an engine at 180. An engine will run hotter than the thermostat rating because it opens and closes in a range. The effectiveness of the radiator and water pump (i.e. heat transfer) will also influence what actual temp and engine runs.

I have read that engines wear quicker at lower temperatures, so 160 is NOT recommended. I have also read that power is best in the 180-190 range, thus running a 180 is more power friendly, but not as fuel efficient.

This could all be bunk, but that is what I have read.
Old Apr 2, 2009 | 02:38 PM
  #16  
sschanz's Avatar
sschanz
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 235
From:
Default

Thx UC. Good points!
Old Apr 2, 2009 | 03:30 PM
  #17  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

Running cooler can, in theory, increase power by providing a slightly cooler intake charge. Some modern performance tunes are sold with lower temp t-stats with this in mind. IMO, benefits are negligible.

My car runs 190-210 most of the time, depending on atmospheric conditions and how heavy my right foot is. Mileage increases slightly when the temp stays at 210 during long trips.
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 07:29 AM
  #18  
jcthorne's Avatar
jcthorne
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 111
From: Texas
Default

can the instrument voltage regulator effect the readings of the various gauges? if so in what direction?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dokilar
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
15
Oct 16, 2015 08:13 PM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
3
Oct 2, 2015 08:06 AM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
Oct 1, 2015 10:29 AM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
Oct 1, 2015 09:21 AM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
Sep 28, 2015 07:03 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 PM.