I love my 69 but you cannot go wrong with either a 67 or 68. There are a ton of aftermarket parts available for the years and if you plan on restomodding or just restoring one to stock either would be great options.

If I had the money my mechanic has a 67 GTA Fastback in his shop I would by myself.

 

What is he asking for it

 

They make a way that you can buy a brand new frame and all the body that has serial issued from ford...has anyone tried or considered this, I was wanting to do it this way so there was zero rust and so I could build it from the ground up. Or does anyone know where one reasonable is, I've looked at the 69s and like them but I like how the 67 is that medium size and not so big and as boxy

 

'69 and '70 fastbacks seem a lot more expensive here in GA than earlier year fastbacks, unless you come across a deal or something. But it seems the opposite with coupes, and I can see why. I don't like the '69+ coupes as much.

And I agree that the '69 fastback does look more "muscular". It's my favorite looking mustang, and I wish I could have afforded one...

 

if you have 15k sitting around for just the body then go for it. its cheaper to buy a old one, strip it, and "de rust it". though it does take time.

 

The Shelby hoods were different for a 67 and 68.

Also, 71k fastbacks were made in 1967 and 42k fastbacks made in 68...fyi. To compare with 132k fastbacks made in 1969 and 87k fastbacks made in 1970*.

(Taken from "Original Mustang 1967-1970, The Restorer's Guide", Colin Date)

James

 

where are all the 69s now lol, i could use one.

 

Probably rotting away in a field somewhere

 

The complete front end is different not just the hood..They are pretty unique cars..

 

Its a unibody car there is no frame and the dynacorn bodies don't come with a vin at all.