Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

10-30 is a little too thin and oil pressure a little low

Old 05-27-2012, 07:47 AM
  #1  
dmaclaren
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
dmaclaren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NH
Posts: 381
Default 10-30 is a little too thin and oil pressure a little low

I am thinking about going 10-40 but what about 20-50?

Also, should I add ZDDP in a rebuilt engine or is that only needed for an orig. motor?

Thanks.
I have searched a bit on the forum but still have these Q's from what I have read.
dmaclaren is offline  
Old 05-27-2012, 09:09 AM
  #2  
craig71springsport
2nd Gear Member
 
craig71springsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 347
Default

10-40. 20-50 is pretty thick.
craig71springsport is offline  
Old 05-27-2012, 10:10 AM
  #3  
LynnBob Mustang
5th Gear Member
 
LynnBob Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 2,243
Default

You use 20-50 when the motor is shot and you don't want it to smoke as bad when a buyer is looking at your car.
10-30 should be fine, but try 10-40 as stated if your motor is wearing out.
Lynn
LynnBob Mustang is offline  
Old 05-27-2012, 10:22 AM
  #4  
Old Mustanger
3rd Gear Member
 
Old Mustanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: IL
Posts: 620
Default

The older engines had a lot looser tolerances than modern engines do.
20W50 may sound heavy by today's standards, but not by engine standards of the 60's & 70's.
In all my older performance Mustangs I ran 20W50 Castrol GTX.

I had a high perf Trans Am (450hp). When I drove to work (90 miles) the oil pressure on my mechanical gage would gradually drop down to around 20psi.
I tried several different oils and they all did this until I tried the Castrol GTX. The Castrol oil never thinned out, never lost viscosity due to heat and never lost a single PSI the whole trip.
Castrol GTX in my opinion is the best oil for a 60's mustangs up through the Fox body 302s.

Note: The newer OHC engines are another story, the heavier weight oils are usually not a good idea with those.

Last edited by Old Mustanger; 05-27-2012 at 12:00 PM.
Old Mustanger is offline  
Old 05-27-2012, 10:41 AM
  #5  
craig71springsport
2nd Gear Member
 
craig71springsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 347
Default

Originally Posted by Old Mustanger
The older engines had a lot looser tolerances than modern engines do.
20W50 may sound heavy by today's standards, but not by engine standards of the 60's & 70's.
In all my older performance Mustangs I ran 20W50 Castrol GTX.

I had a high perf Trans Am (450hp). When I drove to work (90 miles) the oil pressure on my mechanical gage would gradually drop down to around 20psi.
I tried several different oils and they all did this until I tried the Castrol GTX. The Castrol oil never thinned out, never lost viscosity due to heat and never lost a single PSI the whole trip.
Castrol GTX in my opinion is the best oil for a 60's mustangs up through the Fox body 302s.
Thanks for posting this, very informative! I ran 20W50 in my 71 302 because it had an annoying valve tap, but I mean DAMN that thing ran like a dream with that stuff regardless.
craig71springsport is offline  
Old 05-27-2012, 11:56 AM
  #6  
Hwyman
 
Hwyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 29
Default

I had a 71 Pont. GT37, 400, 4 sp. Always ran Castrol 20/50GTX. Too many Sat. night races to even remember. At 190,00 miles I sold it, and had never touched the motor. (unless you count the blown up clutch). For some reason I quit using it with later cars. This reminder may make me re-think that.
Hwyman is offline  
Old 05-27-2012, 01:44 PM
  #7  
BuckeyeDemon
2nd Gear Member
 
BuckeyeDemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 315
Default

out of curiousity what pressure were you getting with the 10-30 cold/hot and also at 1000 rpm and 4000 rpm (or some low and high rpm point)?
BuckeyeDemon is offline  
Old 05-27-2012, 05:08 PM
  #8  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default

i seriously doubt 10-30 is too thin... where all clearances checked during assembly?
rmodel65 is offline  
Old 05-27-2012, 09:12 PM
  #9  
boogerschnot
5th Gear Member
 
boogerschnot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ramona, CA
Posts: 2,682
Default

I had a tired old 3002 in Louisiana and would run 15-40 usually, and straight 40 weight during the hot months.
boogerschnot is offline  
Old 05-28-2012, 01:21 AM
  #10  
musnicki
3rd Gear Member
 
musnicki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 959
Default

I use 5W-20/30, should I be using 10W or even 20W? 302 with Performer RPM heads/Cam.

This thread is a great read btw.
musnicki is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 10-30 is a little too thin and oil pressure a little low



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 PM.