Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Rear end

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2004 | 06:17 PM
  #1  
hgz67's Avatar
hgz67
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7
From: Sweden
Default Rear end



Hello there..</P>


Iīm new to this forum, and I thought Iīd start off with a pic of my new rear end! The car is a -67 Mustang hardtop, with a 351C, C4 trans and a 9" rear.. Itīssort of a 4-link, but without the panhardbar.. Looks weird, but it works, and thatīs the point, right?</P>


Please feel free to comment..</P>


Herman</P>


<IMG src=uploads/hgz67/623F3_PICT0291.JPG border="0"></P>
Old Feb 8, 2004 | 11:10 PM
  #2  
bigchalupa's Avatar
bigchalupa
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 105
From: United States
Default Rear end



looks very awkward, do the coil springs work better than leaf springs? Ive never seen coil in the back</P>
Old Feb 8, 2004 | 11:59 PM
  #3  
bob emmerich's Avatar
bob emmerich
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 303
From: Connecticut,United States
Default Rear end



Definately looks wierd. How did you support the back of the car with the frame rail cut in two? Pardon my mannersI forgot to say, WELCOME!</P><edited><editID>bob emmerich</editID><editDate>38025.9172106481</editDate></edited>
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 10:15 AM
  #4  
hgz67's Avatar
hgz67
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7
From: Sweden
Default Rear end



Hi Bob</P>


Well, the framerail is actuallynot cut all the way through.. The inner wall of it is still intact, plus I made a sort of "shock tower" that is welded to the remaining part of the rail, and to the trunkfloor.. So it is solid enough..! The only downside to this conversion is that it became veery obvious how bad the stockfront end of these cars is.. But that will be taken care of shortly.. <IMG src=smileys/smiley4.gif border="0"></P>


Take care</P>


Herman</P>


<IMG src=uploads/hgz67/DFA81_PICT0210.JPG border="0"></P>
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 07:12 PM
  #5  
bob emmerich's Avatar
bob emmerich
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 303
From: Connecticut,United States
Default Rear end

Interesting. As far as the stock suspension goes, 40 years ago, that was excellent technology. By todays standards, it sucks! That's why there's a smorgasborg of replacement parts for them.
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 08:26 PM
  #6  
hgz67's Avatar
hgz67
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7
From: Sweden
Default Rear end



Haha, I guess so! But I have never been the kind of guy buying a solution, there is so much more fun and enjoyment in creating your own stuff.. Take the rear shocks of my Mustang for an example.. They were a gift from a friend, but they turned out to be about 4 inches to long to work in my car.. so what to do, but to shorten them? I did, altough I COULD have bought a set that was the right lenght to begin with.. But thatīs just not me..<IMG src=smileys/smiley4.gif border="0"></P>


See ya..</P>


Herman</P>
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 08:57 PM
  #7  
hotrodman's Avatar
hotrodman
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,045
From: United States
Default Rear end

is that a home made 4 link???????????
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 07:12 AM
  #8  
hgz67's Avatar
hgz67
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7
From: Sweden
Default Rear end



Well, more or less, yes! I donīt have the same possibilities to adjust this one, as a "real" fourlink, but on the other hand this one behaves alot better when the road isnīt all straight, if you know what I mean..<IMG src=smileys/smiley1.gif border="0">The goal with it was to make a rear suspension that was better than the original, and not needing to cut the entire rear into pieces to weld a new frame in there, as is usually the case when building a 4-link.. It is just a couple of hours work to get it back as it was from factory, except for the two small "shock towers"..</P>


Herman</P>
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mtgldr
S197 Handling Section
5
Feb 3, 2024 09:00 PM
zsmart
Convertible Tech
2
Feb 29, 2016 08:33 AM
Ryan Fitzpatrick
New Member Area
3
Sep 14, 2015 02:21 AM
fastbackford351
Classic Mustang General Discussion
2
Sep 12, 2015 09:42 AM
Dragonus18
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
8
Sep 9, 2015 01:21 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 AM.