Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Hedman vs Hooker Super Comps 70 302

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 11:46 PM
  #1  
palerider's Avatar
palerider
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,001
Default Hedman vs Hooker Super Comps 70 302

Buying ceramic coated long tube headers for my 70 fastback 302, air cond, and PS. debating between Hedman Hedder and Hooker Super Comps. Hookers are $589 and Hedmans are $452 at Summit. Based on fitment chart looks like both should be fine - car is not lowered and don't plan to. Leaning toward Hedman because of $ and life time guarentee - would appreciate any feedback on both. Will be hooking to Magnaflow exhaust.
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 12:53 AM
  #2  
Brandontyler65's Avatar
Brandontyler65
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,845
From:
Default RE: Hedman vs Hooker Super Comps 70 302

i have hedman on my truck and love them
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 11:04 AM
  #3  
Cannonball888's Avatar
Cannonball888
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 457
From:
Default RE: Hedman vs Hooker Super Comps 70 302

Hedman, especially if doing a T5 cable set up.
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 11:10 AM
  #4  
slickman's Avatar
slickman
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,634
From: SC
Default RE: Hedman vs Hooker Super Comps 70 302

Headman's, I have a set of shorty's in ceramic coated and they installed without a hitch..
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 12:42 PM
  #5  
atomsk680's Avatar
atomsk680
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,806
From: DFW
Default RE: Hedman vs Hooker Super Comps 70 302

i think im going to go with hedman in the near future.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bradleyb
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
Nov 27, 2015 07:50 PM
patchshaffer
Tuner Central
3
Oct 5, 2015 02:24 PM
bradleyb
California Regional Chapter
0
Oct 1, 2015 01:02 AM
tj@steeda
Florida Regional Chapter
0
Sep 30, 2015 08:04 PM
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
Sep 28, 2015 10:53 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 AM.