Ok all you mustang enthusiasts out there, I have a ponder question for you and would love all the help I can get.

If the wheelbase of our cars increased from 100.5 (79-93) to 101.3 (94-04) But, the rear suspension dimensions and driveshaft length are the same from 79-04, where did the extra inch come from??

Additionally, comparing my 95 GT to my buddy Terry's 95 Vert, mine is 3/4" shorter. Any ideas why?

Thanks
Kev

 

Maybe the engine is set futher back in a SN95..

 

Longer wheel base doesnt mean the engine was moved. Move the front suspension forward but leave the frame mounts. But I THINK the input shaft and bellhousing are shorter on the SN95 vs the fox cars.

 

That's why I said "maybe"

 

ya its the input shafts of the trans, if you try to swap trannies around you will find out that the 89 WC t-5 wont fit into a 95 [:@]