"ram air" vs cold air
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 14
From:
"ram air" vs cold air
Hi all,
I like the idea/look of a functional hood scoop/scoops. Is there any significant gain from a "ram air" hood (ala cervini) vs a cold air intake (ala K&N) or are they about the same? any loss? Any major headaches from the ram-air set up ie restricted underhood access etc.? (assume for a stock '99 4.6L with cat back exhaust)
Thanks,
I like the idea/look of a functional hood scoop/scoops. Is there any significant gain from a "ram air" hood (ala cervini) vs a cold air intake (ala K&N) or are they about the same? any loss? Any major headaches from the ram-air set up ie restricted underhood access etc.? (assume for a stock '99 4.6L with cat back exhaust)
Thanks,
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 767
From: Omaha, NE
RE: "ram air" vs cold air
ORIGINAL: longsword65
Hi all,
I like the idea/look of a functional hood scoop/scoops. Is there any significant gain from a "ram air" hood (ala cervini) vs a cold air intake (ala K&N) or are they about the same? any loss? Any major headaches from the ram-air set up ie restricted underhood access etc.? (assume for a stock '99 4.6L with cat back exhaust)
Thanks,
Hi all,
I like the idea/look of a functional hood scoop/scoops. Is there any significant gain from a "ram air" hood (ala cervini) vs a cold air intake (ala K&N) or are they about the same? any loss? Any major headaches from the ram-air set up ie restricted underhood access etc.? (assume for a stock '99 4.6L with cat back exhaust)
Thanks,
Isn’t the ram-air solution quite a bit more $$$?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lethaldosage423
Archive - Parts For Sale
1
Oct 19, 2015 12:12 AM