General Tech Ask model specific questions in the appropriate category below. All other general questions within.

Pro's and Con's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 02:48 PM
  #1  
tylerl90's Avatar
tylerl90
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 390
Default Pro's and Con's

What are the pro's/con's of the 5.0 and the 4.6?
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 04:42 PM
  #2  
ravenforbidden's Avatar
ravenforbidden
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 240
From:
Default RE: Pro's and Con's

5.0 Easy to upgrade, usually cheaper in their natural bodies.

poor emissions, trouble maintaining daily driver without some mechainical savey attention first time.

4.6 easyer to make bigger numbers, more Supercharger\Turbocharger Options for street apps

Alot of work to crank above the usual Stage 3 950 numbers, issue with Tuning computers.

Both are strong motors, lot of love, but you have to weigh how much you can participate.

I'm going for a Modular 5.0 and I'm rodding the hell out of it, but I know what to expect, and neither motor is really impossible to learn to manage, it's just more difficult with the newer motor to get the parts to work off the shelf. The 5.0 will require only minor if any tuning, and the 4.6 doesn't need a smog pump, so it's much more efficient, but the 5.0 will easily run away from the 4.6 when the modifications come out at the time. There is few if any good 4.6 Intakes and Heads
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 05:34 PM
  #3  
67mustang302's Avatar
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,468
From: California
Default RE: Pro's and Con's

The biggest advantage of the Windsor engines over the Modular family, is the huge array of aftermarket parts availability, which has kept the cost of Windsor family engines lower to build. In the end it's really all about how much money you have to spend. With an unlimited budget you could get a riding lawnmower to be faster than a fire breathing street beast that was built with a budget of some sort.
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 07:47 PM
  #4  
tylerl90's Avatar
tylerl90
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 390
Default RE: Pro's and Con's

That's what I've heard. I've heard the 5.0's respond alot better to bolt-on's than the 2V 4.6's too. Is that true?
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 08:42 PM
  #5  
OnyxCobra's Avatar
OnyxCobra
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,467
From: Rochester, NY
Default RE: Pro's and Con's

ORIGINAL: tylerl90

That's what I've heard. I've heard the 5.0's respond alot better to bolt-on's than the 2V 4.6's too. Is that true?
very true, 5.0 bolt ons are cheaper also. If you're going 4.6 go with a DOHC or the new 3v.
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 09:49 PM
  #6  
golden_eye's Avatar
golden_eye
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
From: Florida
Default RE: Pro's and Con's

What the guys above have said is true, but the engines also perform a little differently too. The 5.0s have better low-end power but tend to fall on their face above 5000rpm (unless it's cammed for more of course ) while the 4.6 engines love to rev high but are sort of weak down low. 5.0s are not tooexpensive to mod for n/a while forced induction is really the only cheap and practical method of making power with a 4.6. I think the 5.0s have a nicer exhaustsound too, but that's only an opinion really...
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 09:59 PM
  #7  
bacon57's Avatar
bacon57
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 507
From: Lake of the Ozarks
Default RE: Pro's and Con's

I you want to go around 12's or 13's the 5.0 is cheaper but if you want to go really fast get a 4.6 4 valve, the already have good heads and if the block came out of a terminator they are bullit proof. As far as speed vs mpg you will get better gas milage with a 4.6 if they have similar mods.
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 12:13 PM
  #8  
onesickstang01's Avatar
onesickstang01
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 286
From:
Default RE: Pro's and Con's

yea the 5.0 is much easier to work on and is also so much cheaper. i have actaully found them to be more reliable too but others may disagree with that. the best part of 5.0s to me is the low cost and simplicity of finding and installing every part. however the 4.6 is a bit better on gas(barely noticable)
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 01:48 PM
  #9  
golden_eye's Avatar
golden_eye
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
From: Florida
Default RE: Pro's and Con's

The 4.6 is better on gas, but not enough to make that the deciding point b/t the 2. I'm thinking on the order of 1-2 mpg on average. My 5.0 is rated at 17 city and 25 highway (I still have the original window sticker ) and from experience that is almost right on. The 4.6 GTs are rated at something like 17 city and 26 highway IIRC.
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 02:20 PM
  #10  
tylerl90's Avatar
tylerl90
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 390
Default RE: Pro's and Con's

ORIGINAL: golden_eye

The 4.6 is better on gas, but not enough to make that the deciding point b/t the 2. I'm thinking on the order of 1-2 mpg on average. My 5.0 is rated at 17 city and 25 highway (I still have the original window sticker ) and from experience that is almost right on. The 4.6 GTs are rated at something like 17 city and 26 highway IIRC.
Yeah 2mpg wouldn't be a deciding point for me. Is there any "bad years" of the 5.0? Someone told me the 1988's were horrible, but my Dad had an 88 GT and I fell in love with it.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 AM.