General Tech Ask model specific questions in the appropriate category below. All other general questions within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

1966 Ford 289ci motor performance question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2008, 09:08 PM
  #1  
fastboatman29212
Thread Starter
 
fastboatman29212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: SC
Posts: 4
Default 1966 Ford 289ci motor performance question

Hello, I own a 1966 Ford Galaxie with a 289ci motor 2v Autolite carb and AT. I have recieved 2 differing opinions regarding upgrades for the motor. One opinion says that an Edelbrock manifold and 4v carb with stock cylinder heads will not produce any meaningful HP because of the limitations imposed by the valves in the stock heads. Another opinion says that HP will increase and probably fuel efficiency as well because of improved flow dynamics delivering the fuel/air mixture to the heads. I would like to hear opinions from people who have installed an Edelbrock manifold (or other brand) and a 4v onto a stock 289ci motor with stock heads. Thanks
fastboatman29212 is offline  
Old 10-17-2008, 08:10 AM
  #2  
Chopper
5th Gear Member
 
Chopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location:
Posts: 2,028
Default

OK here goes.
I'm not familiar with the valve size used in your engine but using a 4V manifold and carb will definately help out somewhat.The Big Three didn't start strangling the engines in our cars until the early seventies.The engines then only suffered from poor intake qualities and weak cam profiles.
A properly sized 4V carb,intake and,since you'll be close by,a mild street cam will wake up your car quite a bit.A 600cfm (or so) carb would be about as big as I would go.It's better from a tuning standpoint to be a little too small than a little too big.I don't know about the cam since it would have to be matched to the flow capabilities of the engine.
I'm sure Edelbrock sells combo packages that'll make you and your car happy.
One more thing,think about the total picture you have planned for the car.If you're going to have headwork done or even head upgrades in the future it's probably best to wait until you can do them all at once.This cuts down on tuning problems caused by running too big a carb over anemic cams or poor flowing heads.
Chopper is offline  
Old 10-17-2008, 09:56 AM
  #3  
fastboatman29212
Thread Starter
 
fastboatman29212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: SC
Posts: 4
Default

Thanks for taking time to reply. I will probably look into headers as a first thing and wait and do the manifold and 4v later. You have given valuable advice. Thanks.
fastboatman29212 is offline  
Old 10-17-2008, 10:09 AM
  #4  
Gary H
4th Gear Member
 
Gary H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chandler, Az
Posts: 1,080
Default

Performer 289 and a 570 avenger will wake it up alot. Yes, you'll get better gas mileage with the 4v carb as long as you keep your foot out of it. The primaries on a 4v carb are smaller than the 2v.
Gary H is offline  
Old 10-17-2008, 10:41 AM
  #5  
28HopUp
MF Administrator
 
28HopUp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 8,191
Default

First, welcome to MF! I got rid of your other thread in the forums section, and thought I'd add my 2 cents here.

Good advice so far. A small 4V carb, say 500-600cfm and intake (even a Ford stocker) would generate noticable gains. Tied in with a better flowing exhaust and your Galaxie will feel much stronger. Just keep a good balance on parts selection, and you'll be fine.
28HopUp is offline  
Old 10-17-2008, 11:14 AM
  #6  
USMC1775
4th Gear Member
 
USMC1775's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The P.R.K.
Posts: 1,975
Default

Carb would always help out as well as a better flowing intake manifold. As far as headers, I think exhaust is one of the first things that needs to be done on a car
USMC1775 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Stilz
New Member Area
3
08-19-2015 06:17 AM
classic69FB
Motor Swap Section
1
08-12-2015 11:58 PM
$A_Money$81
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
1
08-11-2015 01:30 PM
mustangfan305
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
3
08-07-2015 11:09 AM



Quick Reply: 1966 Ford 289ci motor performance question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 PM.