Difference in Insurance?
Would an LX 5.0 have lower rates than a GT 5.0? I've found one of either modelfor 4k at a local dealer and ifi were to get onethat would be a factor in the decision. Any help? Thanks.</P>
[edit] car 1...87 gt 5 speedconverted to mass air with minor mods like exhaust and headers and junk...but it's red.</P>
car 2...89 lx hatch5 speedbout stock...nice shade of blue.</P>
problem with both is i dont see why 1. the total miles are unknown in both cases 2. if theyre salvage titles (though i cant see why they would be) 3. they look as good or better than most cars they sell there but are about 1-2k under what they would normally charge for em. 4. how freakin bad insurance would suck...full coverage or liability only.</P><edited><editID>Jugador</editID><editDate>37950.9670023148</editDate></edited>
My insurance is pretty cheap. Cheaper than my truck. They're both liability only and under $200/6 months. Of course they're also both 5k miles per year, and neither is my primary, and I'm 26....
lol thanks for the info...just wish someone a little closer my age could tell me the same...or a guess. most likely it will be in-god-damn-sane, but i still wanna shoot for an ole fox anyway...</P>
i can dream right?</P>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Depends on the insurance company, your record, and the state laws in effect. In Indiana, the larger the engine and/or the more "sporty" the car, the premiums are gonna be high. Anything with a V6 or V8 will be more than a four banger...which is why I'm sticking to sport compacts for now. <IMG src=smileys/smiley2.gif border="0"></P>


