General Tech Ask model specific questions in the appropriate category below. All other general questions within.

[Deleted]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 04:50 AM
  #1  
Deleted User's Avatar
Deleted User
Thread Starter
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,638
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 05:14 AM
  #2  
Quik's Avatar
Quik
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,182
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default 90 5.0 VS. 97 GT

the fox body your alot heavier and slower.
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 06:38 AM
  #3  
Dan04COBRA's Avatar
Dan04COBRA
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 14,917
Default 90 5.0 VS. 97 GT



Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
the fox body your alot heavier and slower.
</P>


Anything can happen, remember? You fought this one with me pretty hard, I was kind of suprised to see you give this guy a real answer!</P>


Sorry to hijack your thread like this, but I'm only pointing out how large of a hypocrite this guy is! The 5.0 should put a couple cars on you considering he can drive his 5 speed. <IMG src=smileys/smiley2.gif border="0">Start modding!</P>
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 12:08 PM
  #4  
karma279's Avatar
karma279
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 190
From: United States
Default 90 5.0 VS. 97 GT

Yeah... You will lose. Not to bash, but '97 was a horrible year. Unless his 50 is a POS, he will get at least a couple cars on you.
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 01:11 PM
  #5  
97FordGT's Avatar
97FordGT
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 97
From: United States
Default 90 5.0 VS. 97 GT

Originally Posted by karma279
Yeah... You will lose. Not to bash, but '97 was a horrible year. Unless his 50 is a POS, he will get at least a couple cars on you.
i dont understand why everyone says that 97 is a bad year. i guess just because it doesnt have PI heads. i drive the hell outta my car and have had no problems
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 03:09 PM
  #6  
Jugador1's Avatar
Jugador1
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,963
From: United States
Default 90 5.0 VS. 97 GT

they weigh a lot but the engine wasnt hopped enough to make up for the weight
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 03:37 PM
  #7  
Deleted User's Avatar
Deleted User
Thread Starter
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,638
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 03:39 PM
  #8  
Jugador1's Avatar
Jugador1
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,963
From: United States
Default 90 5.0 VS. 97 GT



weight differernce isnt that much i dont think butthe new modelhas the PI heads</P><edited><editID>Jugador</editID><editDate>37969.5694791667</editDate></edited>
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 03:47 PM
  #9  
Deleted User's Avatar
Deleted User
Thread Starter
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,638
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 04:07 PM
  #10  
Quik's Avatar
Quik
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,182
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default 90 5.0 VS. 97 GT

your body style is heavier then the fox. and your motor lacks the hp. the new ones have different heads and i think a revised intake.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 AM.