Notices
GT S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V8 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

confused

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2013, 09:51 PM
  #1  
UsmcMustang
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
UsmcMustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Cali
Posts: 113
Unhappy confused

allright guys let me list off my mods and then i tell ya my rwhp and what the cause of such a low number could be


- 5.1 l low compression dish pistons - 13.55
- livernois stage 3 heads
- bbk longtube headers
- high flow cats
- outlaw flowmaster axle back
- saleen stage 4 cold air
- comp cams stage 2 nsr
- 47 lbs injectors
- stock intake
- stock throttle body
- livernois lock outs
- 4:10 gears


allright i got it dynoed it made 321 rwhp , which i think is kinda low , i was wondering if it could be because i have a low compression engine ( saving for kenne bell supercharger 2.8 l and a t - 56 magnum )

i believe that static compression is 9.04 , i could be wrong


if that is the cause anyway to increase the compression without using a supercharger since that one will be out of my reach for awhile since im restoring a 67 pontiac tempest at the moment

again any input is appreciated
UsmcMustang is offline  
Old 10-17-2013, 10:18 PM
  #2  
UsmcMustang
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
UsmcMustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Cali
Posts: 113
Default

ps

i had it dynoed back in 2011 minus the injectors and the heads and it made 360 rwhp on a dyno dynamics

the recently one used is a dynojet

i understand you have to take dyno numbers with a grain of salt , on the good side last time it dynoed at 298 and it gained some good amount
UsmcMustang is offline  
Old 10-18-2013, 12:42 AM
  #3  
JCON
5th Gear Member
 
JCON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 2,215
Default

Confused as to what pistons you actually have but yes, running lower compression on a non-boosted car will lower your power. Without heads and pistons you should put down 330-340rwhp. With heads, you should be pushing around 350-360rwhp depending on porting. Nothing really you can do except change your internals again.
JCON is offline  
Old 10-18-2013, 01:53 AM
  #4  
danzcool
5th Gear Member
 
danzcool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 2,073
Default

Well, yes, lower compression lowers horsepower until you boost it. It looks like a built engine, so have you upped the redline yet? I'd guess that upping it to 7k and changing the throttle body would help a bit.
danzcool is offline  
Old 10-18-2013, 08:58 AM
  #5  
PNYXPRESS
5th Gear Member
 
PNYXPRESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 2,952
Default

Originally Posted by UsmcMustang
allright guys let me list off my mods and then i tell ya my rwhp and what the cause of such a low number could be


- 5.1 l low compression dish pistons - 13.55
- livernois stage 3 heads
- bbk longtube headers
- high flow cats
- outlaw flowmaster axle back
- saleen stage 4 cold air
- comp cams stage 2 nsr
- 47 lbs injectors
- stock intake
- stock throttle body

- livernois lock outs
- 4:10 gears


allright i got it dynoed it made 321 rwhp , which i think is kinda low , i was wondering if it could be because i have a low compression engine ( saving for kenne bell supercharger 2.8 l and a t - 56 magnum )

i believe that static compression is 9.04 , i could be wrong


if that is the cause anyway to increase the compression without using a supercharger since that one will be out of my reach for awhile since im restoring a 67 pontiac tempest at the moment

again any input is appreciated
unless Im missing something, it looks like youve done alot to increase airflow thru and out of the engine,but nothing to increase airflow INTO the engine.

headwork, LTs, and cats cant flow air that isnt coming in.
PNYXPRESS is offline  
Old 10-18-2013, 03:15 PM
  #6  
ghunt
3rd Gear Member
 
ghunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: WV
Posts: 750
Default

This is kinda unrelated but I'm curious as to why you got ported heads and then used NSR cams?

On that topic, I was looking at Comp's own literature and they show that the Stage 2 NSR cams are down on power to the stock cams clear up to 5000 RPM. Might also be an issue.

Also I really doubt the stock throttle body and intake are a restriction on a non-sc engine.
ghunt is offline  
Old 10-18-2013, 08:33 PM
  #7  
UsmcMustang
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
UsmcMustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Cali
Posts: 113
Default

before i got the new heads i had the nsr cams , since i want to go with a blower once i get a new tranny i didnt want to spend money on new cams which i need to replace later anyways , same with the intake and throttle body , the kb swaps all that stuff out

i got probe pistons i know they are dish pistons with - 13.55 cc

Pnyxpress , i just saw what you meant , i figured the supercharger would be the increase and air flow , but i see what you mean , i was hoping the bigger heads and bigger injectors would help increase compression ratio since they can move in more air and fuel

again thank you guys for the input
UsmcMustang is offline  
Old 10-19-2013, 08:47 AM
  #8  
Nuke
6th Gear Member
 
Nuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PA to KY ('07) to IL ('09) to MS ('10) to FL ('11)
Posts: 16,182
Default

No mention of who's doing the tuning...
Nuke is offline  
Old 10-21-2013, 10:44 AM
  #9  
AMWill
Former Sponsor
 
AMWill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,632
Default

I think you're right where you should be with a manual, stock TB, stock intake, and current mods. 9.04:1 compression is pretty low for a N/A engine (until it's boosted at least). With aftermarket camshafts, you're going to have more valve overlap causing an even lower than stock dynamic compression. Regardless how free flowing the top end is, I wouldn't expect big power with that compression. Plus, as I mentioned above, having high flowing cylinder heads and aftermarket cams, you're more limited with the factory intake and TB too.

Personally, I wouldn't worry one bit about the power the engine has made so far. Once you throw the 2.8L KB on there, you'll really see what the engine is designed for. Trust me!

Shane
AMWill is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
marc954
4.6L General Discussion
8
09-29-2015 03:05 PM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
6
09-28-2015 05:45 AM
mrappe
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
0
09-26-2015 10:16 AM
marc954
New Member Area
2
09-25-2015 06:48 AM



Quick Reply: confused



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 PM.