Eibach ProKit pics?
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,503
From: Maryland
I pu Pro Kit Springs on my 04. I was Told by tech dept. that I would drop 1 in. The guy @ Texas Mustang told me i was wasting money and time because i would be lucky to get 1/8th of an in. because of the factory lower height of the mach. Well i assumed (bad mistake) the tech dept. new what they were talking about so i ordered them and had them installed and alignment done. $550.50 later I gained nothing!!!! Nothing noticable anyway. I dont think they are taking into consideration the machs lower ride heighth than the GT. And I did express to the companies tech dept that the would be installed on a mach!!! I should have listened to the guy i ordered them from!! He must have heard this problem before! You can see pics in photo gallery and see if u think it looks any lower than stock! Keep in mind it has 18 in wheels!! Hope this helps!!!!
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3
From: TN
As it turns out, a dude I know with a Mach actually has em. I took a look at his car for the 1st time in a while and there was not a huge drop, but noticeable...which is all I'm going for. From the pics, it looks to be about an inch drop. Not alot, but all of the gaps, including the pics w/ stock isos are a little tighter than on my stock suspension. I'd be willing to bet that all of our cars don't exactly settle the same way with similar springs installed. Has your car settled itself a little lower since the install? Thanks for your input, much appreciated.
corner carver
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,371
From: New England
I would go for H&R Super Sports or the Sportlines. The Sportlines will be a bit lower than the H&R's.
On the Mach registry there was a poll and the Super Sports were the most popular spring. That is what I run right now. Eventually I will go coil-over I think but I love these for now.
On the Mach registry there was a poll and the Super Sports were the most popular spring. That is what I run right now. Eventually I will go coil-over I think but I love these for now.
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,503
From: Maryland
5th Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,821
From: The Great Northwest
RYGI would be correct, when lowering our cars that low with those springs it throws off the geometery of the front suspension. you guys should read the article on suspension and how to set it up, i believe its a sticky now.
EDIT: here is the link, read up, its very good stuff.
https://mustangforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=415353
corner carver
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,371
From: New England
+1 CC plates should be used.
If you need to wait after getting springs for a little bit that is fine but I wouldn't just do springs and be done with it. The CC plates will allow for proper alignment as well as a more performance oriented alignment.
If you need to wait after getting springs for a little bit that is fine but I wouldn't just do springs and be done with it. The CC plates will allow for proper alignment as well as a more performance oriented alignment.
corner carver
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,371
From: New England
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
