WOW
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 22
RE: WOW
ORIGINAL: andyman
My freind has a turbo'd S2000 and he is always talking smack, event though it is still a 4-cylinder. You can't polish a turd
My freind has a turbo'd S2000 and he is always talking smack, event though it is still a 4-cylinder. You can't polish a turd
They are light, they can handle, and with FI they are a beast. I kno I used to have one
V8 POWER!
-Steveo
4th Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,192
From:
RE: WOW
ORIGINAL: andyman
My freind has a turbo'd S2000 and he is always talking smack, event though it is still a 4-cylinder. You can't polish a turd
My freind has a turbo'd S2000 and he is always talking smack, event though it is still a 4-cylinder. You can't polish a turd
Mustang GT: 4.6 Lt. 300 HP = 65 HP per Lt.
S2000: 2.2 Lt. 237 HP = 108 HP per Lt.
Any questions as to which is the more efficient engine?
Oh and which manufacturer is enjoying better sales and profits as we speak?
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 22
RE: WOW
http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....53AB53BFC0&p=0
nuff' said NO! NOT THE LS1!! haha
Power to the S2, ill take my stang anyday, as I sold my S2, but u gotta respect it definetly.
nuff' said
NO! NOT THE LS1!! hahaPower to the S2, ill take my stang anyday, as I sold my S2, but u gotta respect it definetly.
4th Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,068
From: Tampa, FL
RE: WOW
ORIGINAL: breyton
Calling a compact powerplant that makes good power and revs to over 8000 rpm smoothly a turd is just crazy. Lets do a little math.
Mustang GT: 4.6 Lt. 300 HP = 65 HP per Lt.
S2000: 2.2 Lt. 237 HP = 108 HP per Lt.
Any questions as to which is the more efficient engine?
Oh and which manufacturer is enjoying better sales and profits as we speak?
ORIGINAL: andyman
My freind has a turbo'd S2000 and he is always talking smack, event though it is still a 4-cylinder. You can't polish a turd
My freind has a turbo'd S2000 and he is always talking smack, event though it is still a 4-cylinder. You can't polish a turd
Mustang GT: 4.6 Lt. 300 HP = 65 HP per Lt.
S2000: 2.2 Lt. 237 HP = 108 HP per Lt.
Any questions as to which is the more efficient engine?
Oh and which manufacturer is enjoying better sales and profits as we speak?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post