Just a quick opinion before I buy. I have a 2000 GT that I have the LM2's on and was going to put a prochamber on. yey or nay before I spend the money.


Thanks

 

I would put on an X pipe if it was my car. This would save you a bit of money over that pro-chamber.
4.6's just sound mean with x pipes unlike 5.0's

 

+1

 

I have a 5.0 and run a MAC H-pipe. Sounds better than my buddys BBK H-pipe. but thenagain im running a 5.0 and you have a 4.6 so idk.

 

I have a O/R pro-chamber on my 01 along with a set of Magnaflow's and really like the sound!!!!!

 

I have a catless prochamber.. I really like the sound.. it gets loud right at 3 grand er so with full lengths and flowmasters.

 

Here is my 04 GT with LM2's and a offroad prochamber. The clip is a little quiet, but they are not much louder than that.

http://videos.streetfire.net/player....E-A2D2C6F63860

 

im in the market also i have slp lm II's and i think im gonna get the mac long tube headers and mac prochamber catless h pipe. Hard to tell from the video but does it have any raspy popping sound to it. i wanna look a little more into sound before the purchase. thanks

 

No raspy popping at all like the X pipe gives. I had my same LMII's and LMI's with an offroad X and both had that horrible rasp popping at around 2-2500 rpm. I got two tickets in one day with the LM1's and the offroad X. Then I decided to get the prochamber, and it made the LM1's ok for the street, but the LM2's just sound glorious with it. Heres what my LM1's sounded like with the o/r prochamber

http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...7579CC7EF4.htm

 

I went from an H-Pipe to the Prochamber. I wouldn't go back to the H-Pipe. Tone sounds a lot better excepcially at high rpms