Pipes, Boost & Juice Talk about Exhaust, Nitrous, Blowers, Turbos, Superchargers... whatever makes you go faster!

kb foxes....?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 6, 2006 | 10:41 PM
  #31  
Justastockmustang's Avatar
Justastockmustang
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 355
From: Maryland
Default RE: kb foxes....?

Actually, this is what I like about the screws!

I'm used to larger displacement motors and the 4.6 just didn't seem to much torque at low rpms. Now it's not a problem.
ORIGINAL: FoxGT

I'm talking about performance, not what is best at breaking the tires loose in 3rd gear at 2000rpm as soon as you punch it.
Old Oct 8, 2006 | 06:05 PM
  #32  
FoxGT's Avatar
FoxGT
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,451
From: United States
Default RE: kb foxes....?

ORIGINAL: mnile9127
When I say this I am talking about perfomance. What would happen when
those tires grab at 2000 rpm in 3rd gear at full rated boost?
I'll would tell you
but you will probably want to see some article clips, statistics, specs, or
some other BS. I was fortunate to be able to drive my friends cars.
No, they weren't same, but the there wasn't that much difference.
Example:
1995 GT KB Mild cam 8psi street/12 psi strip
1996 GT Procharger Intercooled 14psi street/20 psi strip
1992 Notch 408 250 shot
2003 Cobra Eaton 75 shot
1987 Grand National Turbo 23 psi
1992 LX 306 Turbo 10 psi
There are more of my friends cars, that I have driven.
I'm only comparing the power adder, I would prefer everyone of those
cars have the turbo, but if not twin screw all the way.
Generally you move forward.
I just don't understand why you keep saying the kb is the most efficient supercharger. You keep saying it, but you don't show any proof of it. All you can tell me is, "I would rather have a twin-screw over the others" I don't care which car you prefer, I don't care what type anyone prefers. I'm stating facts & you have yet to try to put up a good fight on my main point. This whole thing started over you calling the kb the most efficient. I called bullsh*t. You have yet to show me anything backing up what you're saying, instead you keep telling me which one you like & that you take it anyday over the other superchargers.
ORIGINAL: Justastockmustang
Actually, this is what I like about the screws!

I'm used to larger displacement motors and the 4.6 just didn't seem to much torque at low rpms. Now it's not a problem.
That's your preference & there is NOTHING wrong with that. You think i'm trying to say that the kb is the antichrist. I'm arguing which is the more efficient of the 3. I said the centrifugal is more efficient on top end, I DID NOT say the kb is one of the worst things ever invented. It is a really good supercharger, but it is NOT the most efficient in all aspects. If you love an all range powerband, good for you, that's a whole other argument.
Old Oct 8, 2006 | 07:57 PM
  #33  
mnile9127's Avatar
mnile9127
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 323
From: Chicago, Illinois USA
Default RE: kb foxes....?


ORIGINAL: FoxGT

The best? What makes it the best? The all rpm powerband? Centrifugals are more efficient on high end, so what makes them the best for a person that wants the most power he can get on high end? & for someone that wants to pull stumps... the roots is a more efficient unit for down low power.

A good all around supercharger? hell yes. The best? That depends on what you want.
This is where the disagreement started.
IMO If you're going to spend 2000-4000 you most likely would want all rpm power.
Now if you can tell me you wouldn't like to have all around power for that kind
of money then I say you're F***ing crazy. If you're scared of all out power then
I think you need to be driving a KIA SEPHIA or something, IMO. Like
I said before EFFICIENCY isn't the dissagreement PERFORMANCE of the
power adder is. Based on my experience and what I like, I say
Turbos are the Best Power Adder, Twin Screws are the Best Supercharger
If you you're ever in the Chicago Area, I can SHOW YOU why I say this.

Old Oct 9, 2006 | 03:09 AM
  #34  
FoxGT's Avatar
FoxGT
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,451
From: United States
Default RE: kb foxes....?

ORIGINAL: mnile9127
This is where the disagreement started.
IMO If you're going to spend 2000-4000 you most likely would want all rpm power.
Now if you can tell me you wouldn't like to have all around power for that kind
of money then I say you're F***ing crazy. If you're scared of all out power then
I think you need to be driving a KIA SEPHIA or something, IMO. Like
I said before EFFICIENCY isn't the dissagreement PERFORMANCE of the
power adder is. Based on my experience and what I like, I say
Turbos are the Best Power Adder, Twin Screws are the Best Supercharger
If you you're ever in the Chicago Area, I can SHOW YOU why I say this.
No need, this was a misunderstanding. Now that I know what you're talking about & I 100% agree. I would take the twin screw over the turbo though in the aspect you are talking about, but that's mainly because I love punching it in my mustang at 2300rpm & having gobs of instant power... a kb would just add to the effect. Turbo's don't have the unexpected smashing you into your seat experience to the passenger, it feels more like a rolling into it unless you rev the engine first, but if you do that then the passenger can already tell what you're about to do.
Same pinning you into your seat experience for the driver just not nearly as much because you know what's coming before it comes.
Old Oct 15, 2006 | 01:21 AM
  #35  
mark007's Avatar
mark007
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 16
From: United States
Default RE: kb foxes....?

ORIGINAL: mnile9127

The KB manifold can be custom made to fit whatever lower intake
you already have. The unit bolts directly onto that lower intake.
thats bad info sir. with a kb you have only two choices. either stock lower, or gt40 lower. kb does not make a lower for everyones lower intake. if that was the case then they would take the time to do a intercool for all the pushrod kb's out there.
Old Oct 15, 2006 | 03:02 AM
  #36  
mnile9127's Avatar
mnile9127
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 323
From: Chicago, Illinois USA
Default RE: kb foxes....?

Tell KB to send the Discharge Manifold uncut. Then have it custom cut
to fit your aftermarket lower intake. I didnt give bad info. I wasnt
specific as to what I was saying. As far as an intercooler for the 5.0
pushrod motors, that also takes a little fab work. Heres a pic:


[IMG]local://upfiles/24375/17C175B45C074A99964852CC481D9E91.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/24375/7B513F4FEC1841F6BD463202AFF56A76.jpg[/IMG]
Old Oct 15, 2006 | 03:08 AM
  #37  
grabbem88's Avatar
grabbem88
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,872
From: cape giradeau,mo
Default RE: kb foxes....?

foxgt you havn't been in a turbo car.....a real turbo car sorry....i rode in a few,and let me tell ya i would never complain
Old Oct 15, 2006 | 02:03 PM
  #38  
mark007's Avatar
mark007
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 16
From: United States
Default RE: kb foxes....?

ORIGINAL: mnile9127

Tell KB to send the Discharge Manifold uncut. Then have it custom cut
to fit your aftermarket lower intake. I didnt give bad info. I wasnt
specific as to what I was saying. As far as an intercooler for the 5.0
pushrod motors, that also takes a little fab work. Heres a pic:


[IMG]local://upfiles/24375/17C175B45C074A99964852CC481D9E91.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/24375/7B513F4FEC1841F6BD463202AFF56A76.jpg[/IMG]
i'll check on it monday, but i cant see kb sending out uncut manifolds. especially for such an old setup. but if they do then so be it. also the pics of mikes car(buenospeed or whatever his screen name is) yeah he did 2.5 piping to an intercooler mounted up front. also he spent alot on man hours on the fabrication and cutting and fiting of pieces. it was not cost effective for the minimal gains he got from it. could be reason he sold everything and went centri. he made alil more power with his ambient temps dropping below 20, but it was a constant battle getting the cooler air from the I/C to overcome the heated air coming from the inlet tube. i believe he said that if there was a way to increase the tubing to 3 or 3.5 it may be beneficial, but he scrapped the idea. not trying to kill your image of kb, but the blowe is only as efficient as the motor its on. you want around town fun get a kb. you want mad top end power or a track queen get a centri. you want top end street power turbo is the win. each has its pros and cons. kb's just arent efficient enough in the upper rpm ranges like centris, making them less efficient due to the building of heat in the compressor itself. if you could rid the heatsoak issue and with the aid of methanol inject you will bring down the temp considerably. another thing you can do to help a kb out, no matter which one you have is to open up the inlet side. the more air you can feed a kb. the better she will perform for you. with all the kb combo i've seen that are pushrod motor related no one has hit anywhere close to 18psi. the most so far is 16. and the most power from a well built combo was like 550 rwhp. not bad for a kb unit with no I/C, but you will never get a reliable 18psi from one and hit anywhere over 600. just not possible. oh and before you say i should try one and see for myself. uh yeah i've done the kb 1500 and now am building a kb2200 combo. and even i would love to break the forementioned 600 mark, but you gotta be realistic at some point. aim for 600 get in the 500's . seems alil more feasaible to me that way.

Old Oct 15, 2006 | 02:42 PM
  #39  
FutBall23's Avatar
FutBall23
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 121
From:
Default RE: kb foxes....?


ORIGINAL: mnile9127

The only power adder that is more efficient than a twin screw on high end
is a TURBOCHARGER! I will change my statement and say:
The Best Supercharger is a Twin Screw, but the Best Power Adder
is a Turbo.
Ill have to disagree... the best power adder is a roots style supercharger(for all out power the fastest dragsters in the world i believe are HUGE V8's with a roots) Centrifugals are more efficient superchargers then the twinscrew and techinacly the turbo is a supercharger and the only thing they have to say there the best at is lag time and they are the most efficient (if you want good gas go with them).
Old Oct 15, 2006 | 07:37 PM
  #40  
mnile9127's Avatar
mnile9127
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 323
From: Chicago, Illinois USA
Default RE: kb foxes....?

Well, I hope your project goes well. I'm in the process a build also.
331 Dart Sportman Block using my KB 2200 at 15 psi. I'm
gunning for 700RWHP. Once my new motor is put together.
I'm going to turn up the boost on the existing (12-14psi) and see how
much the stock block will take.





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 AM.